G
Guest
Hi Dmitry. Any further input on this? Thanks!
D
Dmitry Streblechenko
Sorry, forgot to mark the original thread 
The customization could be the problem for VS: customization only modifies
the names and GUIDs of the Redemption objects in the registry, but the type
library embedded in the dll stays intact. VS probably looks for the original
registry keys in the registry (which are missing).
Since you are using registry-free COM, I don't think there is any reason to
also customize the dll since no trace of it will ever be present in the
registry (that is what customization is for).
Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
http://www.dimastr.com/
OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
and MAPI Developer Tool
The customization could be the problem for VS: customization only modifies
the names and GUIDs of the Redemption objects in the registry, but the type
library embedded in the dll stays intact. VS probably looks for the original
registry keys in the registry (which are missing).
Since you are using registry-free COM, I don't think there is any reason to
also customize the dll since no trace of it will ever be present in the
registry (that is what customization is for).
Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
http://www.dimastr.com/
OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
and MAPI Developer Tool