IE Development Team Has to Rethink What They're Offering And Fast
I find Viktor's comments on speed and IE in a Windows OS intriguing. I
have found without a doubt on different machines with different memory
configurations and amounts of RAM that Firefox is so much faster than IE in
loading pages and so much more efficient in handling CPU clock time for the
same amount of pages open it's no contest as to page loading and CPU
efficiency.
Firefox would have to have a quantum leap of exploits discovered to equal IE
and that aside, MSFT's IE development team including all the MSDN bloggers
have dragged their feet in innovations for IE for the last several years,
long predating the launch of Windows XP on October 25, 2001. You guys need
to get cracking for Longhorn since the first Beta is set to release in a
very few months.
If one looks at the extensions available in Firefox, and checks out a book
like the O'Reilly Hacks book on it soon to be in stores,
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/firefoxhks/, does some reading on forums to
optimize FF, keep up with the new versions, and forums for optimizing
Firefox.
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=42
The people who run these groups might consider starting a Firefox group as a
service to everyone, and as an incentive to the IE development teams at
Redmond to get out of the mud and develop features comparable to the rich,
robust functionality (to use an often used Redmonite term) of Firefox
because Firefox ain't standin' still and IE seems to be.
It isn't enough to tweak security a little ala SP2 for the IE team. Firefox
is going to multiply and become more than a cult following. I rarely have to
change browsers when I'm using it.
Chad Harris