G
Guest
Ridiculous interface. The ability to import from existing pst files is beyond
cumbersome. This product has been in need of an overhaul for a long long time.
The product manager is inept or impotent or both. Why? If he or she knows
how to make the product useful and stable, then they aren't inept, but if
they can't sell the company on making it work in a consistent manner, then
impotency must be the problem.
As for not having Outlook also have NNTP capabilities - well now. I suppose
we must have two Email programs, one for Email and the other for Newsgroups.
Stupid business decision. People want turn key solutions, not other
interfaces to learn.
As for Outlook's Business Contact manager: too little, too useless
If Act worked well - and it's a disaster it would be the model because the
features and interface are terrific, but it dies, and Goldmine is another
tragedy.
A useful email program that handles tasks, calendering, email, and is a
central controller of all I/O's with others and the files attendant to them.
To my way of thinking Outlook is a missed opportunity for Microsoft to make
friends with their users.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...9b20&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.installation
cumbersome. This product has been in need of an overhaul for a long long time.
The product manager is inept or impotent or both. Why? If he or she knows
how to make the product useful and stable, then they aren't inept, but if
they can't sell the company on making it work in a consistent manner, then
impotency must be the problem.
As for not having Outlook also have NNTP capabilities - well now. I suppose
we must have two Email programs, one for Email and the other for Newsgroups.
Stupid business decision. People want turn key solutions, not other
interfaces to learn.
As for Outlook's Business Contact manager: too little, too useless
If Act worked well - and it's a disaster it would be the model because the
features and interface are terrific, but it dies, and Goldmine is another
tragedy.
A useful email program that handles tasks, calendering, email, and is a
central controller of all I/O's with others and the files attendant to them.
To my way of thinking Outlook is a missed opportunity for Microsoft to make
friends with their users.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...9b20&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.installation