R
RCox
We have found that when the fields of the summary properties of a file
(i.e. filename.jpg) are filled in using a Win2K computer, the fields
are blank when looking at the summary properties using an XP Pro
computer.
You can use the XP Pro computer to also fill out the fields in this
same file. The XP Pro computers that view the summary see what was
edited by the XP pro computer. The Win2K computers that view the
summary see what was edited by the Win2k computer. The jpg file is on
a Win2K Advanced Server, and is a shared file. We see that the
Alternate Data Stream information is in use after the summary
properties have been filled out.
Has anyone else seen this? Does anyone have an explanation why the XP
Pro doesn't see what the Win2K wrote and vice / versa?
Thanks in advance
(i.e. filename.jpg) are filled in using a Win2K computer, the fields
are blank when looking at the summary properties using an XP Pro
computer.
You can use the XP Pro computer to also fill out the fields in this
same file. The XP Pro computers that view the summary see what was
edited by the XP pro computer. The Win2K computers that view the
summary see what was edited by the Win2k computer. The jpg file is on
a Win2K Advanced Server, and is a shared file. We see that the
Alternate Data Stream information is in use after the summary
properties have been filled out.
Has anyone else seen this? Does anyone have an explanation why the XP
Pro doesn't see what the Win2K wrote and vice / versa?
Thanks in advance