J
JM
A business I'm currently doing some work for (non IT Related) Just bought a
new Acer Aspire computer (australian assembled). Knowing that I'm into PC's
I was asked for a little help in setting things up for them. After they
installed all their usual programs and got the machine to the way they
wanted it I suggested that they Image the HDD to CDR.
Since they lost everything on their previous machine due to one of the well
known faulty Fujitsu drive models failing, they were keen on the idea of
imaging the drive in the new machine. So I installed Drive Image and
proceeded to Image the HDD to CDR. It was then that I noticed that the HDD
was formatted in FAT32X instead of NTFS.
It seemed odd to me that a big company such as Acer would set up the machine
in such a way when it's running XP Home which by default would use NTFS. The
machine also came standard with a DVD burner which makes it all the more
puzzling since FAT32 has file size limitations of 4GB and using a DVD burner
for some tasks involving huge files, especially video is going to require
file splitting etc.
Anyone have any thoughts as to why FAT32 would be considered preferable to
using NTFS by Acer??
new Acer Aspire computer (australian assembled). Knowing that I'm into PC's
I was asked for a little help in setting things up for them. After they
installed all their usual programs and got the machine to the way they
wanted it I suggested that they Image the HDD to CDR.
Since they lost everything on their previous machine due to one of the well
known faulty Fujitsu drive models failing, they were keen on the idea of
imaging the drive in the new machine. So I installed Drive Image and
proceeded to Image the HDD to CDR. It was then that I noticed that the HDD
was formatted in FAT32X instead of NTFS.
It seemed odd to me that a big company such as Acer would set up the machine
in such a way when it's running XP Home which by default would use NTFS. The
machine also came standard with a DVD burner which makes it all the more
puzzling since FAT32 has file size limitations of 4GB and using a DVD burner
for some tasks involving huge files, especially video is going to require
file splitting etc.
Anyone have any thoughts as to why FAT32 would be considered preferable to
using NTFS by Acer??