Could anyone point me to a good "NO FAN" graphics card for my child
who plays game. I might use his computer for editing photos and I
know nothing about games and get lost in a jungle of graphics card.
What card is right depends on how demanding the games are.
Some games are pretty undemanding but in general the 3D
games, especially for an older child who will be more adept
at gaming than a younger one would be... and this looking
forward as the child gets older over the life of the system
and video card, the gaming will tend to be more demanding on
a video card.
his computer is Athlon duo core 4600 with 2G of ram and monitor is
samsung 226BW LCD with max resolution 1600x1200 and (only) 60 hz
refresh rate.
question:
with the spec of the display above, it is waste of money to buy any
graphics card with higher resolution and faster refresh rate?
No, you will need a high performance video card that
supports higher resolutions than 1600x1200 to be able to
play semi-modern games with good eyecandy effects at that
resolution, "IF" the child is playing demanding games. We'd
need some examples of the most demanding games and an idea
of his age.
You will need to buy a video card that has high performance
to not substantially bottleneck the system when playing
games. Generally the budget is the main factor, because
even when a card has a fan you can put an aftermarket
heatsink on it that is passive (up to a point, the really
high powered cards do produce too much heat to be
reasonably, passively cooled).
It is definitely not a waste of money, you could spend over
$250 before it became a waste of money and that does not
include the price of the replacement heatsink. I mean,
UNLESS it is a waste of money in your opinion to spend that
much on a video card for gaming regardless of the other
factors, which is an opinion some people hold.
Generally the slowest things I would suggest as appropriate
for the performance of the system it's being placed in, are
nVidia 7900GS or ATI X1950 series cards. I have not looked
for passive coolers for higher-end gaming cards recently so
this is something you might do, to see which models are
presently supported and what the addt'l cost would be to
refit a passive heatsink on a card.
Keep in mind that with passive heatsinks you don't
necessarily get rid of a fan, instead moving where that fan
is located as such cards tend to need better case
ventilation and typically a case doesn't have such great
ventilation under the video card unless you leave the
adjacent PCI slot empty, leave that empty slot's rear slot
cover off, and have either good exhaust rate at the top of
the case to pull air in through the uncovered slot, or a
strong intake fan in the front of the case which is not
blocked much by the hard drive rack. The other alternative
is a case side panel fan but one low enough to blow on the
video card, not up higher across from the CPU. This need
not be a particularly high RPM/noise fan, would typically be
far quieter and longer lived than a fan directly on the
video card heatsink.
Also keep in mind that if the video card is using
significantly more power than what it replaces, you may need
to determine if your present PSU has enough reserve power to
run it acceptibly or not.