extending Active Directory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Hello.

I wish to extend my schema AD with new attributes.
I found in Microsoft web that if you want extend the schema, first of all
you have to send an e-mail to (e-mail address removed) to register the schema
naming prefix.
I sent the e-mail (1 month ago) but i haven´t response,
What problem can i find if i extend my schema with new attributes without
register my schema naming prefix?

Thank you
 
Hello,

Thank you for posting.

From your post, my understanding of this issue is: You have sent your
schema naming prefix register request to (e-mail address removed) but get no
response. You would like to know whether there is any problem if you
extend the schema without registering the schema naming prefix. If this is
not correct, please feel free to let me know.

Based on my research, if you would like to distribute your application,
then you should register your schema naming prefix. Otherwise, your
application may damage schema and affect AD and other applications. In
addition, OIDs must be unique when extend the schema. When an attribute or
class is added to the schema, no attribute or class with the same OID can
be added. This is true even if a class or attribute has been disabled.
For this reason it is you must use valid OIDs. Do not synthesize an OID,
and do not reuse an existing OID. For more information about obtaining a
valid OID, see Obtaining a Root Object Identifier:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/ad/ad/obtaining_an_object_identifie
r.asp>

Therefore, I would suggest you send your schema naming prefix register
request to (e-mail address removed) again, and they should respond your
request within two weeks. Meantime, you may also submit your feedback on
the following site on this issue, and the appropriate team will respond
your feedback as soon as possible:
<https://support.microsoft.com/common/survey.aspx?scid=sw;en;1255&showpage=1
&ws=msdn&sd=msdn&pa=msdnw>

I appreciate your understanding and cooperation. Should you have any
questions or concerns, please feel free to let me know, and I will do my
best to be of assistance.

Have a nice day!

Steven Wang
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support

--------------------
 
You REALLY should be registered, especially if you don't already have your own
OID space. That way anything you do you won't have to worry so much about
collisions etc. There is an actual person behind the email alias that has to
process that stuff. I know at times they get pretty swamped, you might want to
send another email to followup.

joe
 
ok.
Thank you

"Steven Wang [MSFT]" escribió:
Hello,

Thank you for posting.

From your post, my understanding of this issue is: You have sent your
schema naming prefix register request to (e-mail address removed) but get no
response. You would like to know whether there is any problem if you
extend the schema without registering the schema naming prefix. If this is
not correct, please feel free to let me know.

Based on my research, if you would like to distribute your application,
then you should register your schema naming prefix. Otherwise, your
application may damage schema and affect AD and other applications. In
addition, OIDs must be unique when extend the schema. When an attribute or
class is added to the schema, no attribute or class with the same OID can
be added. This is true even if a class or attribute has been disabled.
For this reason it is you must use valid OIDs. Do not synthesize an OID,
and do not reuse an existing OID. For more information about obtaining a
valid OID, see Obtaining a Root Object Identifier:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/ad/ad/obtaining_an_object_identifie
r.asp>

Therefore, I would suggest you send your schema naming prefix register
request to (e-mail address removed) again, and they should respond your
request within two weeks. Meantime, you may also submit your feedback on
the following site on this issue, and the appropriate team will respond
your feedback as soon as possible:
<https://support.microsoft.com/common/survey.aspx?scid=sw;en;1255&showpage=1
&ws=msdn&sd=msdn&pa=msdnw>

I appreciate your understanding and cooperation. Should you have any
questions or concerns, please feel free to let me know, and I will do my
best to be of assistance.

Have a nice day!

Steven Wang
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Click to expand...
 
ok
thank you

"Joe Richards [MVP]" escribió:
You REALLY should be registered, especially if you don't already have your own
OID space. That way anything you do you won't have to worry so much about
collisions etc. There is an actual person behind the email alias that has to
process that stuff. I know at times they get pretty swamped, you might want to
send another email to followup.

joe
Click to expand...
 
Hi,

Thanks for your reply. If you have any other questions or concerns, please
do not hesitate to contact us. It is always our pleasure to be of
assistance.

Have a nice weekend!

Steven Wang
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support

--------------------
Thread-Topic: extending Active Directory
thread-index: AcXa7qm2ggfCHf0yQdG6aA3pEU4fhg==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 195.55.102.195
From: "=?Utf-8?B?cGFibG9mQG5vc3BhbS5wb3N0YWxpYXM=?="
Click to expand...
References: <[email protected]>
Click to expand...
Subject: RE: extending Active Directory
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:05:03 -0700
Lines: 85
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory:35110
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory

ok.
Thank you

"Steven Wang [MSFT]" escribió:
Hello,

Thank you for posting.

From your post, my understanding of this issue is: You have sent your
schema naming prefix register request to (e-mail address removed) but get no
response. You would like to know whether there is any problem if you
extend the schema without registering the schema naming prefix. If this is
not correct, please feel free to let me know.

Based on my research, if you would like to distribute your application,
then you should register your schema naming prefix. Otherwise, your
application may damage schema and affect AD and other applications. In
addition, OIDs must be unique when extend the schema. When an attribute or
class is added to the schema, no attribute or class with the same OID can
be added. This is true even if a class or attribute has been disabled.
For this reason it is you must use valid OIDs. Do not synthesize an OID,
and do not reuse an existing OID. For more information about obtaining a
valid OID, see Obtaining a Root Object Identifier:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/ad/ad/obtaining_an_object_identifie
r.asp>

Therefore, I would suggest you send your schema naming prefix register
request to (e-mail address removed) again, and they should respond your
request within two weeks. Meantime, you may also submit your feedback on
the following site on this issue, and the appropriate team will respond
your feedback as soon as possible:
<https://support.microsoft.com/common/survey.aspx?scid=sw;en;1255&showpage=1
&ws=msdn&sd=msdn&pa=msdnw>

I appreciate your understanding and cooperation. Should you have any
questions or concerns, please feel free to let me know, and I will do my
best to be of assistance.

Have a nice day!

Steven Wang
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Back
Top