G
Guest
I have had a profound security problem, and I get conflicting information
from Microsoft technicians. Two of them, 2nd level Research department, say I
should not download an ActiveX control that has an expired security
certificate. Today's tech insists there's nothing wrong with doing that.
Here is what has happened to me repeatedly, on at least four different
machines:
With a freshly reformatted hard drive, and the protection of a router
firewall and Service Pack 2, I go straight to the Microsoft Update site. The
first thing that happens is a warning for the ActiveX control required to get
updates, and the security certificate has an expiry date (consistently) of
October 15, 2005. When I have, in the past, downloaded the thing, it popped
up on the Anti-Spyware Beta as unrecognized by Microsoft.
What appears to happen, if you look at the install logs for critical
updates, is that many of them appear to be being retrieved from the
pagefile.sys location. There are lots of other troublesome lines of code in
those logs, although I don't pretend to be a developer -- or even
knowledgeable about the mysteries of Microsoft.
Today's Microsoft technician--he the one who insisted we use the ActiveX
control with the expired security certificate-- said, when confronted with
these troubling lines of code, "These are not for you or I to know," as if
that somehow clears up the issue.
All I know is that if I "just use the machine," I get all kinds of security
problems, including, eventually, a QuickBooks program that will not work
because of a "virus." That, despite clean scans from the fully updated Norton
(or Kaspersky or McAfee, it doesn't matter) I have on the machine, and clean
online scans from the vendors.
I have looked at other machines log files that have these updates installed
legitimately, and they all show the update files being retrieved from a temp
file or even a web address -- never a pagefile.sys.
I appreciate all the folks that answer these posts, even the ones who aren't
always terribly courteous. I especially appreciate the courteous ones.
Best regards, S
from Microsoft technicians. Two of them, 2nd level Research department, say I
should not download an ActiveX control that has an expired security
certificate. Today's tech insists there's nothing wrong with doing that.
Here is what has happened to me repeatedly, on at least four different
machines:
With a freshly reformatted hard drive, and the protection of a router
firewall and Service Pack 2, I go straight to the Microsoft Update site. The
first thing that happens is a warning for the ActiveX control required to get
updates, and the security certificate has an expiry date (consistently) of
October 15, 2005. When I have, in the past, downloaded the thing, it popped
up on the Anti-Spyware Beta as unrecognized by Microsoft.
What appears to happen, if you look at the install logs for critical
updates, is that many of them appear to be being retrieved from the
pagefile.sys location. There are lots of other troublesome lines of code in
those logs, although I don't pretend to be a developer -- or even
knowledgeable about the mysteries of Microsoft.
Today's Microsoft technician--he the one who insisted we use the ActiveX
control with the expired security certificate-- said, when confronted with
these troubling lines of code, "These are not for you or I to know," as if
that somehow clears up the issue.
All I know is that if I "just use the machine," I get all kinds of security
problems, including, eventually, a QuickBooks program that will not work
because of a "virus." That, despite clean scans from the fully updated Norton
(or Kaspersky or McAfee, it doesn't matter) I have on the machine, and clean
online scans from the vendors.
I have looked at other machines log files that have these updates installed
legitimately, and they all show the update files being retrieved from a temp
file or even a web address -- never a pagefile.sys.
I appreciate all the folks that answer these posts, even the ones who aren't
always terribly courteous. I especially appreciate the courteous ones.
Best regards, S