G
Gary McGill
I have a Word 2000 document with some embedded Excel (2000) charts. The
charts themselves are quite small, and so use a very small font (Gill Sans
Light @ 5pt). When I print the document, one of the charts looks great, but
the others seem to use the wrong font (it looks like Arial).
Even if I copy the "good" chart, the copy suffers from the same problem as
the others. This is not specific to one machine (a colleague has replicated
the problem), nor to one printer (I can get the same result when printing to
PDF).
My colleague did manage to get all the charts to come out correctly after
some tweaks to the size of the charts - but we can't figure out what's
making the difference, or how to do it reliably.
Any ideas as to (a) what's going wrong, and (b) how to avoid it?
Gary
PS. Some more info:
* Each chart was created in Excel, whereupon I selected the chart, copied
it, then pasted it into Word - thus creating an embedded Excel chart &
worksheet within Word. I don't think this is the problem, though, since all
the charts were created the same way, and one works fine!
* Each chart is un-scaled in Word, by which I mean they are all at 100% x
100% of original. (When I adjust the size of an embedded chart, I always
open the chart and do it in Excel). That said, the "tweaking" that my
colleague did to get the charts to work may have involved some small scaling
adjustments in Word.
* I have the "auto-scale" font-size setting turned off for all the charts.
* Although the charts seem to use the wrong font, it does appear at what
looks like the correct size. Also, it's not "rasterized" - when printed to
PDF I can zoom all the way in and the edges of the characters are still
smooth.
* The font I'm using is a Windows PostScript font. (I had the option of
buying a TrueType or OpenType version, but I have a bias in favour of
PostScript fonts when creating PDFs - which is what this document is for).
* In "print preview", all of the charts look the same (i.e. the "good" one
and the "bad" ones are indistinguishable). None of them look like they use
the correct font - in fact they look very odd, because the character spacing
seems all wrong, as if the character positions were based on the correct
font despite it being drawn with another.
charts themselves are quite small, and so use a very small font (Gill Sans
Light @ 5pt). When I print the document, one of the charts looks great, but
the others seem to use the wrong font (it looks like Arial).
Even if I copy the "good" chart, the copy suffers from the same problem as
the others. This is not specific to one machine (a colleague has replicated
the problem), nor to one printer (I can get the same result when printing to
PDF).
My colleague did manage to get all the charts to come out correctly after
some tweaks to the size of the charts - but we can't figure out what's
making the difference, or how to do it reliably.
Any ideas as to (a) what's going wrong, and (b) how to avoid it?
Gary
PS. Some more info:
* Each chart was created in Excel, whereupon I selected the chart, copied
it, then pasted it into Word - thus creating an embedded Excel chart &
worksheet within Word. I don't think this is the problem, though, since all
the charts were created the same way, and one works fine!
* Each chart is un-scaled in Word, by which I mean they are all at 100% x
100% of original. (When I adjust the size of an embedded chart, I always
open the chart and do it in Excel). That said, the "tweaking" that my
colleague did to get the charts to work may have involved some small scaling
adjustments in Word.
* I have the "auto-scale" font-size setting turned off for all the charts.
* Although the charts seem to use the wrong font, it does appear at what
looks like the correct size. Also, it's not "rasterized" - when printed to
PDF I can zoom all the way in and the edges of the characters are still
smooth.
* The font I'm using is a Windows PostScript font. (I had the option of
buying a TrueType or OpenType version, but I have a bias in favour of
PostScript fonts when creating PDFs - which is what this document is for).
* In "print preview", all of the charts look the same (i.e. the "good" one
and the "bad" ones are indistinguishable). None of them look like they use
the correct font - in fact they look very odd, because the character spacing
seems all wrong, as if the character positions were based on the correct
font despite it being drawn with another.