Hi Jason,
Thanks for update!
Actually, only Windows 2000 domain controllers that are configured to
replicate directly with the PDC FSMO role holder replicate the checkpoint
information. This situation may generate the 1586 event on other domain
controllers that do not replicate directly with the PDC FSMO role holder.
At this point, you may safely ignore the 1586 event. You do not need to
create a connection object always from the DCs to the PDC emulator in a
large domain.
If there is anything that is unclear, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks & Regards,
Jason Tan
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
| Thread-Topic: event ID 1586
| thread-index: AcVWIc0Vr+1jJY4BQW2ihnMHpaXV7Q==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 83.247.136.10
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?amFzb24=?=" <
[email protected]>
| References: <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
| Subject: RE: event ID 1586
| Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 05:06:02 -0700
| Lines: 119
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server:5846
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server
|
| Hi jason,
|
| i must say
|
| "in the topology don't replicate DIRECTLY with
| the pdc master fsmo owner."
|
| i determine it from the connection object that is configured in
| > Active Directory (AD) Sites and Services of the domain controller that
gives the error, i have 2 domain controllers that give that error, both are
configured (as usual) with two partners to replicate (authomatic topology)
and none of his partners have the fsmo of pdc. All other dc's that have in
his replication topology the pdc as a partner don't have the error in the
event log.
|
| My question is, in a large domain , of course, not all dcs can have as a
| DIRECT REPLICATION partner (one of the two) the pdc fsmo role owner, must
i
| create a connection object always from the dcs to the pdc emulator to
solve
| that error?
|
| Thanx for your help
|
|
| --
| information is like sex if good is fantastic if not.... oh... better than
| nuthin'
|
|
| "Jason Tan (MSFT)" wrote:
|
| >
| > Hi Jason,
| >
| > Thanks for posting!
| >
| > Please help me know how you determine "in the topology don't replicate
with
| > the pdc master fsmo owner."
| >
| > For some information, please refer to the following article:
| > Verify successful replication to a domain controller
| >
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/Opera
| > tions/00e7f86b-ccd3-4cb8-9a01-bf747241b500.mspx
| >
| > Based on my further research, as the Q269417 said, this behavior can
occur
| > because the domain controller on which this event occurs did not
| > successfully replicate the checkpoint information for downlevel backup
| > domain controllers (BDCs). If a domain controller is not configured to
| > replicate directly with the primary domain controller (PDC) Floating
Single
| > Master Operation (FSMO) role holder, it does not replicate the
checkpoint
| > information.
| >
| > So I recommend you double check if the connection object is configured
in
| > Active Directory (AD) Sites and Services the domain controller on which
| > this event occurs. If not, please manually configure in Active
Directory
| > (AD) Sites and Services to replicate from the PDC FSMO role holder.
| >
| > If there is anything that is unclear, please feel free to let me know.
| >
| > Thanks & Regards,
| >
| > Jason Tan
| >
| > Microsoft Online Partner Support
| > Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
| >
| > =====================================================
| >
| > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
so
| > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
| >
| > =====================================================
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > --------------------
| > | Thread-Topic: event ID 1586
| > | thread-index: AcVVfzPRKTniZ1tCSdeD9UA9bT95nA==
| > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 83.247.136.10
| > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?amFzb24=?=" <
[email protected]>
| > | Subject: event ID 1586
| > | Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:42:06 -0700
| > | Lines: 17
| > | Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | Importance: normal
| > | Priority: normal
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server:5836
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server
| > |
| > | Two of my dc's keep in their eventlog the 1586, both in the topology
| > don't
| > | replicate with the pdc master fsmo owner. all other bdcs that have
the
| > pdc
| > | owner as a partner of replications don't have the error.
| > |
| > | Must i create another replication topology or build a new connection
| > object
| > | between my dcs and the pdc owner?
| > |
| > | All my domain is a mixed mode w2000.
| > |
| > | i read the q269417 and don't get the clue about my question bcoz it
talks
| > | about bdcs and role transfers .
| > |
| > | thanx in advance!
| > |
| > | --
| > | information is like sex if good is fantastic if not.... oh... better
than
| > | nuthin'
| > |
| >
| >
|
