Epson Stylus Photo 1400: opinions please

  • Thread starter Thread starter james
  • Start date Start date
J

james

I'm on the verge of buying the Epson Stylus Photo 1400, but would like
some real-world feedback first... there's lots of reviews, but nothing
about head clogging for instance. I'm ditching my 1280 simply because
the head cleaning doesn't work any more.

Thanks in advance for any info...



Jim



http://www.jamesphotography.ca
 
I'm on the verge of buying the Epson Stylus Photo 1400, but would like
some real-world feedback first... there's lots of reviews, but nothing
about head clogging for instance. I'm ditching my 1280 simply because
the head cleaning doesn't work any more.

Thanks in advance for any info...



Jim



http://www.jamesphotography.ca


I've had one for about 6 weeks now with no problems and excellent results.
Frank
 
Canon Pro 9000 is a better printer producing better photo prints at a faster speed with more economical ink.

If you want a pigment printer consider the Canon Pro 9500 or the Epson R1800.

Canon has much less an issue with print head clogging.

[email protected] wrote:

I'm on the verge of buying the Epson Stylus Photo 1400, but would like some real-world feedback first... there's lots of reviews, but nothing about head clogging for instance. I'm ditching my 1280 simply because the head cleaning doesn't work any more. Thanks in advance for any info... Jim http://www.jamesphotography.ca
 
measekite said:
Canon Pro 9000 is a better printer producing better photo prints at a
faster speed with more economical ink.

If you want a pigment printer consider the Canon Pro 9500 or the Epson
R1800.

Canon has much less an issue with print head clogging.
Uhhh..how do you know? You don't do you. You're one delusional sick liar
of an idiot.
I've owned both, a Canon I9900 and the Epson 1400.
Which one's do you or did you own? Oh, neither one huh? Well, so you
speak about these printers without any first hand user experience right
and you want us to believe you? You don't have any credibility in this
ng. You destroyed it long ago my friend.
The Epson is a much better printer.
You need to go down to the local mental institution and re-commit
yourself as the last treatment didn't work.
Frank
 
I'm on the verge of buying the Epson Stylus Photo 1400, but would like
some real-world feedback first... there's lots of reviews, but nothing
about head clogging for instance. I'm ditching my 1280 simply because
the head cleaning doesn't work any more.

Thanks in advance for any info...



Jim



http://www.jamesphotography.ca



For the small difference in price from the Epson 1400, I would
recommend the Epson R1800. It's a much better printer and uses
UltraChrome Gloss ink.
 
Before you ditch the printer, if you have not already done so, request a
copy of my cleaning manual. It is free of charge and you will not be
spammed by me.

It is specifically designed for Epson printers.

I can be reached at:

e-printerhelp(at)mvps(dot)org

(at) = @
(dot) = .

The 1400 uses the new Claria inks, which I have received good feedback
about.

Art
 
The price differential has reduced. The R1800 uses glossy pigment
inks, and had a hard time with black and white printing. It does best
with glossy images. The color ink set is unique to that printer.



Art
 
CarBone wrote:

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:50:30 -0000, [email protected] wrote:



I'm on the verge of buying the Epson Stylus Photo 1400, but would like some real-world feedback first... there's lots of reviews, but nothing about head clogging for instance. I'm ditching my 1280 simply because the head cleaning doesn't work any more. Thanks in advance for any info... Jim http://www.jamesphotography.ca



For the small difference in price from the Epson 1400, I would recommend the Epson R1800. It's a much better printer and uses UltraChrome Gloss ink.


Still a step below the Epson 3800
 
measekite said:
Still a step below the Epson 3800

No shit sherlock and about 3 times the price.
You're a brainless ****wit moron of an idiot aren't you.
Get lost and don't come back.
Loser.
Frank
 
Back
Top