Thanks!
Probably not worth it unless you want to do panoramas. Cost is higher
by area wher I am for roll papers. You would ideally need an A3 rotary
paper cutter.
So, does it poke the paper out for you to cut manually, then pull it
back in? There is no built in paper cutter? I probably will at least try
this for architectural prints at 13" wide plain paper line drawings.
Sounds like it may be easier to buy roll paper, pre-cut it myself &
define custom paper sizes.
My 6MP DSLR photos are 3008x2000 pixels, at 150dpi that's 13x20" so the
13x19 cut sheets are not really appropriate. I know 150dpi is coarse but
it's impressive at a large size and you tend not to look so close. I've
tiled letter size prints to 30x40 & it's sometimes worth doing.
If I had 13" roll stock, I could do 8-1/2x13 prints from the DSLR
without cropping.
Go in to printer settings. Scroll down the "size" combo box until you
get to "User Defined".
Argh, I just missed that somehow.
One of your other problems about incorrect paper orientation can be
solved by always feeding the paper in "portrait" mode. Enable "print
preview" in the printer driver.
Thanks, I found the good old preview option with 'Advanced' clicked.
So far, I haven't had to run a cleaning cycle after 3 months - including
several periods of a couple of weeks with the printer off. I suspect
that the newer epson pigment printers may be a vast improvement on the
way things were in the past. Time will tell...
Ah, so it is a new 'pigment' technology, my old C80 was a different ink.
I was suggesting just the test pattern to use a small amount of ink on
every single color but it'll be hard for me to remember to do this
regularly, I sure hope clogging is less of a problem, my C80 had banding
problems from day 1, I even got them to replace the first one, with this
one, I did have to run the cleaning cycle once to get the first print to
come out clear.
Be careful. It appears that you can run heavier media through than
Epson claim/recommend, but there is always the possibility of damaging
the print head.
I have printed my own business cards & folded brochures in the past,
that card stock is not much heavier than heavy duty gloss photo paper.
I'll be killing myself if I damage the heads though!
Note that the recommended maximum is based on grams/sq
metre. Densities vary - so the recommended max gsm is *probably* based
on light density paper. There are some user forums at photo-i.co.uk,
where various papers are discussed - amd may be worthwhile browsing for
you for all sorts of things related to the R1800.
Thanks, great resource, here's there R1800 forum:
<
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/BB/viewforum.php?f=8&sid=947f76dcf291aff067c91c6f03a34bc9>
I see one discussion of paper thickness in mils, people used up to 27
mil I'm not sure what business card stock is, I see also that they used
the 'straight thru feeder' on the back which to my eyes is not straight
thru, it still comes from above and needs to bend. The printer is
capable of printing on CD's so should be able to handle very thick
materials but it looks like the CD tray goes in the front. Anyways
here's that discussion about paper thickness:
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/BB/viewtopic.php?t=417
A few tips:
When it come to changing ink cartridges, don't hold down the "ink"
button on the printer. Press it only briefly to get the head into
position. Pressing it for more than a couple of seconds initiates a
full head cleaning cycle - a glorious waste of ink.
The initial set of inks don't appear to last very long. The second set
last much longer. It appears that a reasonable amount of the first set
gets used in priming the system.
Great stuff!
Avoid any "swellable polymer" papers. Despite Kodak claiming that some
of their papers are suitable for "all" inkjet printers, it certainly
isn't suitable for pigment printers.
Yeah, I learned this the hard way.
Avoid Epson Matte Heavyweight paper with this printer. (Use Archival
Matte). Not sure if it is a driver issue, but Matte Heavyweight causes
streaky colour transition between high saturation red through browns to
green.
I've been happy with premium gloss papers in the past, heavy enough to
look like 'real' photo paper. Frankly when printing 6MP pics at a large
size, the resolution is so poor that any old absorbant plain paper seems
adequate, it's just as well if it bleeds & blurs the pixelization a bit.
I tried some really cheap 'contruction paper' & it looked good. I'd have
to do a stitched panorama to get enough pixels to do serious photo
prints at 13x20. I wonder about an acid free water color paper that
would give this bleeded softening effect for large 6MP prints.