Arthur said:
Epson suggests printing at least once a week.
Why should you have to print something you do not need and waste ink to
keep a printer that has some faults in its design from clogging. I have
used my HP for many years and left it idle for months at a time and
never had head clogging. While expensive, the HP design (even though I
do not like the concept of TriColor carts) is probably the best of all
printers when it comes to print head clogging.
I am hoping my Canon print head lasts. But from what I read on this NG,
Epson by far has the most problems of any of the 3 printers when it
comes head clogging. And the majority of cases the people just happen
to use after market ink or have used them in the past. That is
unfortunate because I like Epson as a company and I enjoy my Epson
Scanner. I purchased that over the Canon because I felt it was better.
I want to make something perfectly clear. I do not use after market
inks because my print load does not warrant any risk. If and when my
print load rises where it is economically justifiable to try a 3rd party
product I would most likely sample Sensinent Formulabs BRANDED and
Manufactured inks from a reseller that I feel is professional and
represents themselves that way. I would most likely start with
prefilled carts and use those until they are no longer economically
justifiable. At that time there is the issue to investigate the quality
of the cartridges themselves.
It does help to limit clogs although I have some Epson printers that
sit for months and months and work on first trial. It seems to depend
upon the parking on the cleaning station and if the rubber dam gets
damaged or distorted, or if the head builds up a lot of ink under it.
Why do Epson printers have all these probems?