S
Steve Bond
Hello,
I have just bought an Epson Perfection 2400 Photo. I used it to scan a
bunch of photos for a colleague, at 300dpi. When I sent them to him, he
pointed out that one of the photos had been scanned before, and that the
first scan (done on a 1640SU at 300dpi) was much clearer. I checked and it
was true, the 2400 output had less contrast, was darker and looked
positively blurred in comparison with the razor-sharp output from the 1640.
I have been playing with the brightness and contrast settings but I cannot
get the 2400 to output an image that matches the output of the 1640 (at
this resolution).
Anyone have opinions on this? Are 2400 users happy with their scans?
Steve
I have just bought an Epson Perfection 2400 Photo. I used it to scan a
bunch of photos for a colleague, at 300dpi. When I sent them to him, he
pointed out that one of the photos had been scanned before, and that the
first scan (done on a 1640SU at 300dpi) was much clearer. I checked and it
was true, the 2400 output had less contrast, was darker and looked
positively blurred in comparison with the razor-sharp output from the 1640.
I have been playing with the brightness and contrast settings but I cannot
get the 2400 to output an image that matches the output of the 1640 (at
this resolution).
Anyone have opinions on this? Are 2400 users happy with their scans?
Steve