Although everything you say is true, I suspect for the application this
person has, your solution is somewhat of an overkill, both financially
and technically.
I beg to differ. At $45, QImage is very reasonably priced and does a
superb job of printing. Even without serious system colour calibration, I
think it would make a big difference to the colour balance. /Any/ software
that supports colour profiles couldn't help but improve on Word!
For $79, DDI also sells Profile Prism which, though not as thorough as a
hardware/software combination, does a pretty good job of improving the
colour workflow at a much lower price. I had a lot of problems getting
consistently good colour balance on my scanned and digital images until I
used PP, when I realised that a large part of the problem was that I had
my monitor's colour temperature set at 9300K instead of 6500K. My pictures
looked fine to me on screen but print colour was all over the place.
I also suspect that an outsider could produce a reasonable result for
him using his files even without calibration.
Depends on the source of the images. If they've been edited/tweaked on a
system with a badly adjusted monitor, it could be very difficult to
achieve the required result. (Note that I did say 'very difficult to
achieve what you want' in my original post, not 'impossible'). If they're
straight from a reasonably good digital camera, were well exposed and the
colour balance was correctly set (i.e. they weren't taken on a sunny day
with colour balance set to cloudy or visa versa), then they may come out
OK. However, I note that the original post said: "...all my pics in
Microsoft Word came out greenish, though the jpegs, show brownish hue...",
which makes me think that images from different sources have been combined
to create the cover and that some serious work will have to be done on the
artwork as a whole to achieve an acceptable balance.
I'm not being critical of you, because in the professional world there
is an expectation of calibrated open loop systems.
I'm not a professional. I do sell prints, though, so call me a fussy
semi-pro!
In fact, if this person has a scanner it probably came with some image
manipulation software for color correction. Even if the image looks
"wrong" on the screen, with a little experimentation, he can probably
get the image to print fairly correctly... in his case, since it prints
too green, bring down the cyan and yellow and bring the magenta up so
the image looks too magenta (pink) and it may print correctly.
Agreed. It may take a lot of trial and error but it may be possible. But I
still think that investing in QImage (which must be cheaper than getting
covers printed commercially) would pay dividends in the long run.
Jon.