JWSM said:
Yes, ICE is checked. Ok, no slides on the rocks in future.
My last scanner was Umax 1200s, so can see a few improvements (Umax's
professional software was less tedious). Wonders why Epson does not make
the 35mm slide carrier able to independently hold the slides. You could
lift all 8 on/off scanner glass with the holder. As pointed out by others,
the hinges are inferior for such a heavy lid, and the shudder/click it
makes is particularly annoying.
Having said all that, am happy with the beast. Although, it is being
replaced after 24 hours due to dried moisture streaks/condensation on
underside of glass (in fact it's filthy).
J
46 minutes for 8 high-res ICE captures sounds normal. With all the
"warming lamp" messages, scans often take 50%-100% longer than ES's
"time remaining" estimate.
If you don't like the normal operating sounds, make sure you don't
block the hinge-side calibration area of the document table. It'll
sound like a mini-jackhammer is rumbling away inside.
What in particular is wrong with the hinges? I'm not blown away by
the design, but I don't have any trouble keeping the lid balanced 90
degrees from the scanning table when I'm switching materials.
Down the road, we're both apparently due for some permanent
under-glass fog regardless of initial conditions. A pity.
What's up with flatbed design, anyway? Why is the hardest-to-clean
surface sitting wide open where *everything* that gravity pulls down
will land on it? Why have *glass* as the point of contact, so that
every new scan presents an opportunity for fingerprints or even
scratches? Why not have the neutral "reflective" backing as the
document-holding surface, and keep the glass and lens hidden away up
above until they're needed? Is it too hard to keep the mechanisms
stable? If the lens mechanism was top-mounted, wouldn't it even be
easier to remove and clean the glass without causing dust to rain down
into the works?
Well, why not?
false_dmitrii