B
Bill Heck
I have been using Outlook 2000 as my email client for several years
(IMAP email). I pay no attention to the Address Book as such, but have
a large (500+ entries) Contacts file; all email addresses are here
(along with other info).
With Outlook 2000, if I type a partial name into the TO line and then
move to another field, Outlook usually finds the name and completes the
address. For example, if I type "J Smith" in the TO field and start
composing the messge, Outlook finds "Joseph Smith" and completes TO
entry accordingly. This works for multiple persons in the TO field as
well as the CC and BCC fields. This is a very quick entry method.
If Outlook cannot resolve the address, I click on the TO button and
select from the list. The list is sorted by last name, which is what I
want.
Outlook 2003 fails to recognize partial names. So if I type "J Smith"
in the TO field, it just underlines it in red. Then when I click on the
TO button, Outlook presents the list sorted by first name.
I tried going through the online training and followed the directions to
change the sort order, but the procedure did not seem to work.
A few additional notes: AutoComplete is turned on, but it seems to work
only for names or addresses that already were typed in -- and since
Outlook doesn't recognize the names that I type, that's no help. The
problem is not that Outlook can't find my Contacts list -- that does
come up when I hit the TO button (even though it's sorted on the first
name rather than last).
At this point, I have removed Outlook 2003 and reinstalled 2000. But
there must have been something wrong with my setup. How can I persuade
Outlook 2003 to act more like 2000?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
(IMAP email). I pay no attention to the Address Book as such, but have
a large (500+ entries) Contacts file; all email addresses are here
(along with other info).
With Outlook 2000, if I type a partial name into the TO line and then
move to another field, Outlook usually finds the name and completes the
address. For example, if I type "J Smith" in the TO field and start
composing the messge, Outlook finds "Joseph Smith" and completes TO
entry accordingly. This works for multiple persons in the TO field as
well as the CC and BCC fields. This is a very quick entry method.
If Outlook cannot resolve the address, I click on the TO button and
select from the list. The list is sorted by last name, which is what I
want.
Outlook 2003 fails to recognize partial names. So if I type "J Smith"
in the TO field, it just underlines it in red. Then when I click on the
TO button, Outlook presents the list sorted by first name.
I tried going through the online training and followed the directions to
change the sort order, but the procedure did not seem to work.
A few additional notes: AutoComplete is turned on, but it seems to work
only for names or addresses that already were typed in -- and since
Outlook doesn't recognize the names that I type, that's no help. The
problem is not that Outlook can't find my Contacts list -- that does
come up when I hit the TO button (even though it's sorted on the first
name rather than last).
At this point, I have removed Outlook 2003 and reinstalled 2000. But
there must have been something wrong with my setup. How can I persuade
Outlook 2003 to act more like 2000?
Thanks in advance for any advice.