G
George Macdonald
There have been lots of comments, including mine, on the absence of Xeon
EM64T 64-bit performance results... anywhere. The only thing I've come
across is this: http://www.computeractive.co.uk/news/1156849 - only one
test and one which would seem to favor memory bandwidth and prefetch. I'm
not sure how it, Gnu Privacy Guard, stacks up as a measure of expected
general performance but it looks like Intel's Xeon/Nocona is performing in
the same ballpark here as AMD's Opteron, if you scale up the 1.8GHz Opteron
in the test to say a 2.2GHz version.
This kinda leaves me wondering why Intel is being so coy/silent on the
subject of 64-bit performance. In the past, even under NDAs, they've
generally managed to find a way to leak favorable comments on their latest
widget.
Rgds, George Macdonald
"Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??
EM64T 64-bit performance results... anywhere. The only thing I've come
across is this: http://www.computeractive.co.uk/news/1156849 - only one
test and one which would seem to favor memory bandwidth and prefetch. I'm
not sure how it, Gnu Privacy Guard, stacks up as a measure of expected
general performance but it looks like Intel's Xeon/Nocona is performing in
the same ballpark here as AMD's Opteron, if you scale up the 1.8GHz Opteron
in the test to say a 2.2GHz version.
This kinda leaves me wondering why Intel is being so coy/silent on the
subject of 64-bit performance. In the past, even under NDAs, they've
generally managed to find a way to leak favorable comments on their latest
widget.
Rgds, George Macdonald
"Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??