Davej said:
Ok, I'm getting discouraged. I wanted to figure out a parts list for a
low-end E6400 gamer but I keep seeing comments here which break my
budget. Here are some questions that have me stumped...
1. Do I really need a $150+ case/power supply for a reliable system
(that will last for years)?
2. Is a 10k disk better/faster than two small 7200's?
3. How do I pick a motherboard when all I know is that...
-- I want reliability
-- I want several extra PCIx1 slots
-- Only slight over-clocking would be attempted
4. At what performance-point is a video card "overkill" for an E6400?
Thanks!
1) The case itself is about "beauty" and "convenience". Even a $20 case
will hold all the components. Cooling is not an issue, unless you're
building a monster system with a couple 8800GTX in it
You should spend the money on a power supply. Even a $50 power supply
can power an E6400 system, and give years of service. Just avoid
picking up a "500W $20" power supply, because that is false
economics. If it fries all your stuff, the $30 saving will seem
small indeed.
2) For gaming, once a level is loaded, you hardly care about disks. What
a 10K disk buys, is reduced seek time. Which is handy for making the
"find" command run fast, if your disk is not indexed. I would sooner
spend the money on two 7200RPM drives, one of which is used for
offline backups of the other disk.
3) There are two kinds of motherboards in the market. There are some
older FSB800 chipsets, which are being overclocked by the motherboard
manufacturer, to make FSB1066 motherboards. Those motherboards will
not overclock much further. While the motherboard may be a bargain,
it really only runs your E6400 at stock speed.
Chipsets purpose-built for FSB1066, cost a bit more. Intel has the
975 and 965 families. Nvidia has some recent product introductions.
And ATI has one chipset, if it ever sees the light of day (last
announcement was, that only DFI would carry it). You might look at
this one:
GIGABYTE GA-965P-S3 LGA 775 Intel P965 Express ATX Sale Price: $108.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustratingReview.asp?Item=N82E16813128017
http://images10.newegg.com/NeweggImage/productimage/13-128-017-08.JPG
4) Review sites don't typically provide that info. Because it is a
two dimensional test array (test all video cards, versus several
different speed processors, equals a *lot* of testing). This chart
is one of the few I know of, that demonstrates the issue. The gray
bars shows what happens to expensive video cards that are starved
for processor.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2003/01/20/vga_charts_ii/page5.html
You can look through the charts here, and see the breakpoints for
card families.
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/
$200 buys a lot of video card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102070
Unlike 7900GT, I don't see reports of card failures for this 7900GS.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustratingReview.asp?Item=N82E16814130056
The usual benchmarks:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html
HTH,
Paul