Hello Gerry,
Robert is correct.
Be careful not applying cores where it should read sockets.
Point me to the agreement, it should be referencing sockets not cores
Thanks,
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
--------------------
<Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:42:22 +0000
<From: Gerry Hickman <
[email protected]>
<User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.11)
Gecko/20050728
<MIME-Version: 1.0
<Subject: Re: Dual processor support
<References: <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
<In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
<Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
<Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
<Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup
<NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.157.202.222
<Lines: 1
<Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl
<Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup:16555
<X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup
<
<Hi Robert,
<
<>> But how will Vista handle things like the new Intel Quad
<>> Core CPUs?
<
<Good question.
<
<> Same way XP did. It supports multiple *processors*. The amount of cores
per
<> processor is irrelevant
<
<I read today in the volume license agreement that you are only allowed
<to install Vista to max two processor cores! Not sure about OEM and retail.
<
<I know it sounds a bit crazy and maybe they'll change it, but probably
<worth a mention.
<
<--
<Gerry Hickman (London UK)
<