Dreamweaver templates and ASP.net 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rishi Boparai
  • Start date Start date
R

Rishi Boparai

I'm using Dreamweaver to create the layout and manage my ASP.net 2
site. However, all ""code-behind"" is done in Visual Studio 2005

On my ASP.net pages I need to have a different declaration at the top
of each page, e.g.:

It was my understanding that Dreamweaver would leave alone any code
outside of the < html > tag However, whenever I update my template,
the ASP.net declarations in the pages based on the template are
removed by Dreamweaver. This means my pages lose the ""link"" to their
code-behind files. Which is BAD!

The weird thing is, that if I remove for example the ""@"" from the
declaration (therefore making it an incorrect declaration) then DW
leaves the code on the page. What this means is that DW only has
problems with ASP.net declarations. Its quite happy to leave any other
text or code.

What can I do?



Thanks.
 
I'm using Dreamweaver to create the layout and manage my ASP.net 2
site. However, all ""code-behind"" is done in Visual Studio 2005

On my ASP.net pages I need to have a different declaration at the top
of each page, e.g.:

It was my understanding that Dreamweaver would leave alone any code
outside of the < html > tag However, whenever I update my template,
the ASP.net declarations in the pages based on the template are
removed by Dreamweaver. This means my pages lose the ""link"" to their
code-behind files. Which is BAD!

The weird thing is, that if I remove for example the ""@"" from the
declaration (therefore making it an incorrect declaration) then DW
leaves the code on the page. What this means is that DW only has
problems with ASP.net declarations. Its quite happy to leave any other
text or code.

What can I do?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Dear Rishi

I too have tried in the past to use DW in conjunction with VS. I had
similar problems and in the end relented and now work exclusively in
VS. They don't live happily together. DW is designed to be a site
manager or to be used in collaboration with others using the same
tool.

DW does have its own way of handling ASP.NET and provides basic
support, essentially for page development in script mode. As you've
probably noticed it is not as sophisiticated as VS for code editing
which I assume is why you are doing your code behind files in VS. It's
a pity really because VS not as good as DW when it comes to visual
(design mode) editing of the .aspx file, though I've found it does
help if you turn on the visual aides in VS so you can see the layout
tags.

However, since version 2 of ASP.NET and the introduction of Master
pages I wouldn't go back to DW templates. By comparison DW templates
are a weaker method of maintaining common layouts. Any changes to a DW
template and you have to re-upload all pages that use them, whereas
with master pages any changes are reflected immediately in content
pages without having to touch them.

There is also the question of themes in ASP.NET I only have version
2004 of DW which is too old to have any support whatever for themes. I
don't know about later versions. Having said that Fireworks is great
for images. I still use it. VS has no equivalent.

On a more general note, my advice to anyone using either of those
tools is learn HTML thoroughly - especially CSS styles. Don't just
rely on visual editors to do everything for you. It's surprising what
layout, appearance and other problems you can fix by knowing exactly
how it all works. Visual editors seem to make a lot of mistakes when
you try to make changes and refinements - sometimes they refuse let
you do things at all!

HTH
 
Back
Top