Drab Scans of Slides with Nikon LS-4000 w/Nikon Scan 3.1

  • Thread starter Thread starter john chapman
  • Start date Start date
J

john chapman

I do bulk scans of Slides with a Nikon LS4000 using Nikon Scan 3.1,
with final manipulation in Photoshop, but am trying to minimize the
amount of post scan manipulation as much as possible. Right now my
scanned slides are dark and rather lifeless (dull colors and low
contrast)-- nowhere near the life of the original slide. I am in
dire need of some suggestions on how to set up Nikon Scan parameters
for my bulk scans.

I am able to brighten the scans by increasing the Master Gain (to
about +.6) in the Analog Gain Palette, but the colors and contrast
still remain a bit muted. Most scans still require increasing the
contrast, at a minimum. But I am not sure this is the approach I
should be using since the Brightness Function in the Color Balance
Palette and the functions of the LCH Editor Palette would seem also to
have some effect on the exposure of the scans, as well. It is obvious
to me that I really do not understand the use/purpose of these other
controls.

I would appreciate some suggestions on the initial setup, as a
starting point, rather than my continuing to flail around in the dark
(pun not intended) on a trial and error basis. Thanks in advance for
assistance.
 
Have you created a custom profile for your scanner? I used Monaco, and that
helped a lot..

Jim
 
john said:
I do bulk scans of Slides with a Nikon LS4000 using Nikon Scan 3.1,
with final manipulation in Photoshop, but am trying to minimize the
amount of post scan manipulation as much as possible. Right now my
scanned slides are dark and rather lifeless (dull colors and low
contrast)-- nowhere near the life of the original slide. I am in
dire need of some suggestions on how to set up Nikon Scan parameters
for my bulk scans.

I am able to brighten the scans by increasing the Master Gain (to
about +.6) in the Analog Gain Palette, but the colors and contrast
still remain a bit muted. Most scans still require increasing the
contrast, at a minimum. But I am not sure this is the approach I
should be using since the Brightness Function in the Color Balance
Palette and the functions of the LCH Editor Palette would seem also to
have some effect on the exposure of the scans, as well. It is obvious
to me that I really do not understand the use/purpose of these other
controls.

I would appreciate some suggestions on the initial setup, as a
starting point, rather than my continuing to flail around in the dark
(pun not intended) on a trial and error basis. Thanks in advance for
assistance.

Before messing about with the scanner settings, make sure that your
monitor is set up correctly. You have Photoshop, so you could use Adobe
Gamma for this. Be careful, the first step - getting the black and
white level - is critical and a poor black level will inevitably result
in you selecting the wrong gamma.

Apart from the Analogue Gain controls, every other adjustment is made on
the scanned data. Specifically, the LCH palette has NO effect on the
exposure. It merely permits post scan adjustments exactly the same as
the Curves palette, but according to a Lightness-Chroma-Hue model
instead of the RGB model. The only difference between the master RGB
Curve and the Lightness is the weighting of the red green and blue
channels.

In NS, go to the Preferences section Colour Management tab and enable
Nikon Colour Management, making sure you have the colorspace you want to
use in Photoshop selected under RGB. While there, make sure that you
have autoexposure and autofocus switched on under Preferences|Single
scan. If you are going to scan film strips make sure the same setting
is used for Batch scan as well. Also go into the Advanced Colour
section and adjust the sample point size to 5x5 pixels andAutocontrast
excluded level to something like 0.1% or lower fro the black and white
levels. Reset the white, grey and black point targets as well, just in
case you have changed these at any time in the past.

Take a slide which has a reasonable amount of pure white and pure black
in it and preview that. The autoexposure should result in a scan which
is pretty well exposed but, to be sure, look carefully at the histogram
in the Curves Palette.

Be sure to clear any adjusments that you might previously have applied
to the black, white and gamma levels by pressing the master reset icon
(bottom right with three lines). The histogram should extend from 0 to
255. If you find that the white is clipped at a level significantly
below 255 then adjust the Master Gain control and preview again to bring
the clipped level closer to that value, but don't exceed it. If there
is a lot of saturation at 255 then adjust the Master Gain in the
opposite direction and preview again. If you notice two or three spikes
near the right hand side of the histogram, look at the histograms of the
individual colours and adjust the individual Gain for these colours
accordingly to get something close to 255 in each one.

Having achieved a reasonable exposure, select an area of the preview
using the crop tool which includes most of the image (certainly the near
black and white areas) but none of the slide mount. Then return to the
curves window and click on the autocontrast icon (circle with half
white, half black) and this should return the curves window
automatically to the RGB view and adjust the histogram levels to almost
exactly the full 0 to 255 range. However you might want to adjust
manually the upper and lower ranges in each colour to reduce the slight
clipping that inevitably results. The idea is to get the black and
white points set to exactly where black and white lie in the image.

Having done all of that, select your crop to exactly the area you want
for all future scans, and select the ICE, GEM & ROC setting you desire,
together with 8-bit depth. Save the setting under the "Settings" menu
to a name you will remember and also "Set User Settings", which will
save these settings as your defaults for subsequent scans.

That should get you pretty close to optimum scans, so try a couple of
images to begin with. If there is a slight residual colour cast, then
look for an area that you know is neutral mid-grey in an image and use
the grey dropper in the Curves Palette to select it in the preview. This
should take out any "slope variation" in the film dye transmission that
might exist between the broad spectrum that your eyes see and the narrow
spectrum that the LEDs see. When you are happy, save the setting and
Set User Setting.

You should be ready to go for bulk scans now but, depending on what mix
of film and age they are, you might need to revisit the settings and
save new settings for specific films. Remember to use the Kodachrome
setting if you are using KC emulsion - which will almost certainly
require fine adjustment of the Curves for every batch of film. You
might also want experiment with the other settings for global gamma in
the Curves palette, the Colour Balance palette or Colour Saturation
(chroma in the LCH palette), and Unsharp Mask, and your final preferred
default setting for these can be saved under the settings menu as above.

Hope that helps.
 
I do bulk scans of Slides with a Nikon LS4000 using Nikon Scan 3.1,
with final manipulation in Photoshop, but am trying to minimize the
amount of post scan manipulation as much as possible. Right now my
scanned slides are dark and rather lifeless (dull colors and low
contrast)-- nowhere near the life of the original slide. I am in
dire need of some suggestions on how to set up Nikon Scan parameters
for my bulk scans.

Which slide film are you using?
 
I am still playing around with your suggestions, which have been very
helpful. I do, however, have several other questions.

It seems to have no effect whether I set autoexposure to on or leave
off. Does this mean the AE is defective in the ls4000? Or is AE a
software based control?

I have also been experimenting with Vuescan which does not seem to
have a setting for AE. However, with little or no setup or tweaking,
it gives better results than Nikon Scan. The Vuescan images are a bit
more contrasty and have more of the vibrance and depth that slides are
known for.

Are the settings saved in the Tool Pallette part of the overall
settings, or must they be loaded separately each time?

If I understand your instructions correctly, I should take a good
slide with range of values and containing black and white areas. I
should scan the slide and set the values in the tool pallette to
provide good results, save those settings. Then each time I run with
that setting, the software will provide the same tweaking as specified
in the save settings. Is that essentially correct?
 
I have also been experimenting with Vuescan which does not seem to
have a setting for AE. However, with little or no setup or tweaking,
it gives better results than Nikon Scan. The Vuescan images are a bit
more contrasty and have more of the vibrance and depth that slides are
known for.
As far as I see, VueScan will autoexpose unless you tell it not to.
You can do that with the "lock exposure" setting on the Input tab
after doing a preview. You can crop part of the image and lock
exposure to what it has calculated for that part crop. Then recrop to
the whole image and have it use the locked setting. (I find this is
helpful with sunsets, where the whole image contains a lot of
silhouette or shadow which is of no interest, together with beautiful
sky which you want perfectly exposed). Or you can choose lock exposure
and overtype VueScan's calculated values with values of your choice.
But there does not seem to be any way of doing that independently for
red, green and blue. However, based on my limited experience, VueScan
does indeed produce a much better result than NikonScan, with or
without my intervention!

Even VueScan attempts to give you as much of the dynamic range as it
can from the image by being conservative with white and black points.
If you want punch, without using an image editor, you can be much more
aggressive with the white and black points and sacrifice some
highlight or shadow detail.

I have found that VueScan can produce images that look on my monitor
to be identical in both colour and punch to the slide as projected by
my slide projector. Playing around with manual colour balance is very
powerful, particularly with right mouse click.
 
john said:
I am still playing around with your suggestions, which have been very
helpful. I do, however, have several other questions.

It seems to have no effect whether I set autoexposure to on or leave
off. Does this mean the AE is defective in the ls4000? Or is AE a
software based control?
Autoexposure is a software based control, but I think you might have to
restart NS to enable the change to take effect.

Autoexposure takes a low resolution pass of the image and then adjusts
the actual exposure to bring the highlights up to a level which achieves
a nearly full CCD without saturating it. It isn't like the autoexposure
of a film camera, which effectively adjusts the exposure to get the
average brightness level to match a defined reference. If it did that,
then it is quite likely that highlights would saturate the CCD, which
has a hard limit rather than soft limit of film.
I have also been experimenting with Vuescan which does not seem to
have a setting for AE. However, with little or no setup or tweaking,
it gives better results than Nikon Scan. The Vuescan images are a bit
more contrasty and have more of the vibrance and depth that slides are
known for.

Vuescan has specific algorithms built in to get you close to the correct
colour balance right away. Many folk prefer that, but I have never been
really happy with its output myself for reasons I have given in these
parts many times before.
Are the settings saved in the Tool Pallette part of the overall
settings, or must they be loaded separately each time?
Palette settings saved using "Set User Settings" become the default
settings next time the driver loads. Settings saved using "Save
Settings..." can be saved to a file for recall later. I have several
settings saved this way for each of the file types I use.
If I understand your instructions correctly, I should take a good
slide with range of values and containing black and white areas. I
should scan the slide and set the values in the tool pallette to
provide good results, save those settings. Then each time I run with
that setting, the software will provide the same tweaking as specified
in the save settings. Is that essentially correct?
That's pretty much it.
 
Thanks to your suggestions I have been able to substantially improve
the output from my Nikon Scan scans.

Vuescan does not seem to have provisions for executing Digital Ice,
ROC, or GEM (but I have pure software versions of the latter two in
any case). Although I had sharpening turned off, the Vuescan results
were noticeably sharper, with more detail, than those from Nikon Scan.
This difference may be a primary source for my perception that the
Nikon scans were kind of flat and which triggered my initial question
in this thread. Test procedures were the same slide at same minimum
processing through both systems; and then displayed side by side in
Photoshop, and enlarged multiple times. But even at full screen size,
the vuescan version was sharper. I assume that vuescan could be doing
some unrequested hidden post scan processing, but the results on my
ls4000 were better than with using Nikon Scan.
 
Back
Top