Does Vista partition an IDE ATA/133 HD differently than previously?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Captain Roberts
  • Start date Start date
C

Captain Roberts

Ok, I just partitioned my second HD with Vista x86 into 3 Primary partitions. Now, I get errors with partition programs saying the sizes are incorrect. Before I "Fix" these errors, has something changed in the way Vista allocates space with the partition tables on drives?
 
Captain Roberts,

I don't know of anything that has changed. Use Vista to check it out and to
make the partitions and to format the partitions. Right click Computer
(formerly My Computer) and then select Manage and then select Disk
Management. In Disk Management you can view the hard drive, its partitions
and change them, etc. Let us know what you find.
 
I did. I used Vista to create the partitions to start with, then I formatted them at the Vista setup stage, and one by one I installed
1. Vista Ultimate x86
2. Vista Ultimate x64
3. Server 2008 Beta 3 x86

So,everything should be ok, right?

Captain Roberts,

I don't know of anything that has changed. Use Vista to check it out and to
make the partitions and to format the partitions. Right click Computer
(formerly My Computer) and then select Manage and then select Disk
Management. In Disk Management you can view the hard drive, its partitions
and change them, etc. Let us know what you find.
 
Captain,

Yes, the good lord willing and the creek don't rise. When I installed Vista
Home Premium on a new bare drive (personal home system), I didn't partition
nor format. Vista took care of that during the installation process. In
WinXP (and prior), we always had to go through the partition and format
procedure before we could install Windows. Not in Vista. It didn't ask nor
let me know what it was doing. It just did all that was necessary to install
Vista with no intervention required, thank you. I was so surprised. I'd not
seen that before.
 
Thanks Freddy. So, it now seems that partitioning the drive into 3 primary partitions causes older HD tools to think there are errors that need to be fixed. I know that DOS would only allow 1 Primary, and then the rest had to be extended. So, this could well be a hangover from those days. thanks Freddy.


Captain,

Yes, the good lord willing and the creek don't rise. When I installed Vista
Home Premium on a new bare drive (personal home system), I didn't partition
nor format. Vista took care of that during the installation process. In
WinXP (and prior), we always had to go through the partition and format
procedure before we could install Windows. Not in Vista. It didn't ask nor
let me know what it was doing. It just did all that was necessary to install
Vista with no intervention required, thank you. I was so surprised. I'd not
seen that before.
 
Based on my experience with the Beta version of Vista - do NOT accept older
tools offer to "repair" the disk structure. I tried it with POwerquest Drive
Image, and ended up with a disk that that Vista wouldn't boot from or even
read - took a complete format etc. (using the Vista install DVD) to recover.

Bob,
 
From the Vista GUI interface you can only partition a HD with 3 primary and 1
extended partitions, from the command prompt you can partition 4 primary
partitions. And Vista's formatting is different from XP's and many older 3rd
party applications will wrongly report that there are disk errors.


Thanks Freddy. So, it now seems that partitioning the drive into 3 primary
partitions causes older HD tools to think there are errors that need to be
fixed. I know that DOS would only allow 1 Primary, and then the rest had to be
extended. So, this could well be a hangover from those days. thanks Freddy.


Captain,

Yes, the good lord willing and the creek don't rise. When I installed Vista
Home Premium on a new bare drive (personal home system), I didn't partition
nor format. Vista took care of that during the installation process. In
WinXP (and prior), we always had to go through the partition and format
procedure before we could install Windows. Not in Vista. It didn't ask nor
let me know what it was doing. It just did all that was necessary to
install
Vista with no intervention required, thank you. I was so surprised. I'd
not
seen that before.
--
freddy


Captain Roberts said:
I did. I used Vista to create the partitions to start with, then I
formatted them at the Vista setup stage, and one by one I installed
1. Vista Ultimate x86
2. Vista Ultimate x64
3. Server 2008 Beta 3 x86

So,everything should be ok, right?

Captain Roberts,

I don't know of anything that has changed. Use Vista to check it out and to
make the partitions and to format the partitions. Right click Computer
(formerly My Computer) and then select Manage and then select Disk
Management. In Disk Management you can view the hard drive, its partitions
and change them, etc. Let us know what you find.
partitions. Now, I get errors with partition programs saying the sizes are
incorrect. Before I "Fix" these errors, has something changed in the way Vista
allocates space with the partition tables on drives?
 
Thank you Bob, I thought as much.

Based on my experience with the Beta version of Vista - do NOT accept older
tools offer to "repair" the disk structure. I tried it with POwerquest Drive
Image, and ended up with a disk that that Vista wouldn't boot from or even
read - took a complete format etc. (using the Vista install DVD) to recover.

Bob,
 
Thank you Cal. This helps. I would tell you more, but an NDA prevents me. ;0)
From the Vista GUI interface you can only partition a HD with 3 primary and 1 extended partitions, from the command prompt you can partition 4 primary partitions. And Vista's formatting is different from XP's and many older 3rd party applications will wrongly report that there are disk errors.


Thanks Freddy. So, it now seems that partitioning the drive into 3 primary partitions causes older HD tools to think there are errors that need to be fixed. I know that DOS would only allow 1 Primary, and then the rest had to be extended. So, this could well be a hangover from those days. thanks Freddy.


Captain,

Yes, the good lord willing and the creek don't rise. When I installed Vista
Home Premium on a new bare drive (personal home system), I didn't partition
nor format. Vista took care of that during the installation process. In
WinXP (and prior), we always had to go through the partition and format
procedure before we could install Windows. Not in Vista. It didn't ask nor
let me know what it was doing. It just did all that was necessary to install
Vista with no intervention required, thank you. I was so surprised. I'd not
seen that before.
 
Back
Top