F
fuladi
Hi there,
I use the File Replication Service in a W2K environment,
and it seems to me that the replication service serialises
the files that are replicated. I have some processes that
write folders (with approx 200 files in each folder) to a
Dfs share across the network. When there is just one
instant of the "writer" process running (writing just one
folder with 200 files), it'll take about 63 secs to
replicate all 200 files. But, when there is two instances
running (writing one folder each), it'll take about 128
seconds to replicate all the files of one folder, and when
there is 8 instances running - each writing one folder,
it'll take approx (63*8) sec before any one of the folder
is fully replicated. These results make me believe that
FRS serializes the files to be replicated. But, this would
be contradictory to the claim that " ...FRS replicates up
to 8 files at a time."
I'll appreciate any information that you can provide.
thanks,
Fari
I use the File Replication Service in a W2K environment,
and it seems to me that the replication service serialises
the files that are replicated. I have some processes that
write folders (with approx 200 files in each folder) to a
Dfs share across the network. When there is just one
instant of the "writer" process running (writing just one
folder with 200 files), it'll take about 63 secs to
replicate all 200 files. But, when there is two instances
running (writing one folder each), it'll take about 128
seconds to replicate all the files of one folder, and when
there is 8 instances running - each writing one folder,
it'll take approx (63*8) sec before any one of the folder
is fully replicated. These results make me believe that
FRS serializes the files to be replicated. But, this would
be contradictory to the claim that " ...FRS replicates up
to 8 files at a time."
I'll appreciate any information that you can provide.
thanks,
Fari