Does anyone use Avast Antivirus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Santa Punk
  • Start date Start date
S

Santa Punk

I hardly see anything in here about Avast Antivirus, even though it
seems to be a great program that I have had no trouble with.

Recently, I saw someone posting about how they can't get signature
updates from Avast anymore. I don't seem to be having any problems
getting them, but I was wondering if any other Avast users were
experiencing difficulty getting their signature file updates as well.
 
Santa Punk said:
I hardly see anything in here about Avast Antivirus, even though it
seems to be a great program that I have had no trouble with.

Recently, I saw someone posting about how they can't get signature
updates from Avast anymore. I don't seem to be having any problems
getting them, but I was wondering if any other Avast users were
experiencing difficulty getting their signature file updates as well.

I'm running it.... no problems here...
And a definate improvement over AVG.

Regards,
Dave
 
David Baxter said:
I'm running it.... no problems here...
And a definate improvement over AVG.

Regards,
Dave
I'm running it and am quite pleased. After it's update last week it
detected a trojan on my machine, that I knew was there (I put it there-it
reports to me) but Norton has, so far, not detected on any of the other
machines i have it running on. Well done, Avast!

Stella
 
Santa Punk said:
I hardly see anything in here about Avast Antivirus, even though it
seems to be a great program that I have had no trouble with.

Recently, I saw someone posting about how they can't get signature
updates from Avast anymore. I don't seem to be having any problems
getting them, but I was wondering if any other Avast users were
experiencing difficulty getting their signature file updates as well.

It is greatly better than AVG (IMO) and it is by far the best free AV
product I've seen. Mine has trapped everything thrown at it, (intentionally
and otherwise), and I like that it has separate clients that you can turn on
or off for resident scanning, POP e-mail, Exchange e-mail, Peer-to-Peer, and
Instant Messaging. As far as I can tell it doesn't slow my system down at
all. And the recovery database feature makes it way better than AVG for
repairing damaged files.

Gregg C.
 
Santa said:
I hardly see anything in here about Avast Antivirus, even though it
seems to be a great program that I have had no trouble with.

Recently, I saw someone posting about how they can't get signature
updates from Avast anymore. I don't seem to be having any problems
getting them, but I was wondering if any other Avast users were
experiencing difficulty getting their signature file updates as well.


That's true, most people here tend to write about AVG when it comes to
free e-mail clients. But personally I haven't had any problems with
Avast, if anything I've found it to be rock solid. Updates come out
very regularly and it seems to pick up all the 'virii' (I love being
politically incorrect) that come through to my inbox. Works natively
with Mozilla, most popular P2P progs, and is extremely easy to use. I
think that once more people find out about Avast there will be more posts.

Cheers

Troy
 
I hardly see anything in here about Avast Antivirus, even though it
seems to be a great program that I have had no trouble with.

I will give you 'one' example of why I like Avast!

I DL'd a free but suspicious file. Avast alerted to a trojan,
which actually was 'spyware', a commercial trojan, but still
something I do NOT want on my computer. The parasite was an exe
within an exe but it couldn't hide from Avast. I find Virus, worms,
trojans, etc, are not difficult to avoid if you understand Safehex.
Spyware is more of a problem because there are 'few' preventives.
AdAware will tell you AFTER spyware is installed, which is too late.
SpybotSD and others have 'immunize' and SpyBlaster is great, but
most other protection uses valuable resources. Avast will not catch
all spyware but it can help without adding 'another' protective
device. End of rant. :-)

I also tested the infected file with:

EZtrust
F-Prot for DOS
AVG
on-line scanners,
Trend Micro HouseCall:
http://housecall.antivirus.com/pc_housecall/
and
RAV AntiVirus Online Virus Scan
http://www.ravantivirus.com/scan/

and none alerted. I'm guessing Avast's heuristic scan picked up
on something involving the installation method, as the trojans
are not identified by name. Hurrah for Avast.

Although this is not the intended purpose of AVs, it is a plus
I like. If anyone would like to test 'their' AV, here are my
findings. DO NOT INSTALL the screensaver, just test the SS.exe.

This free program was listed in the alt.comp.freeware NG and
appeared to be a normal message. It's homesite is
www.acez.com. Note the 'Z' in the url, it's a clue.

Acez screensavers contain the commercial trojan, Incredifind.
Their HauntedHouse SS, is identified below, but SkyWriter SS is a
smaller DL, and contains the same infections for testing purposes.
Both were DL'd and Avast alerted on both.

Snooper was used to find 'what' Avast had alerted. It could have
been, but was NOT a 'false alert'.

* Halloween Haunting ScreenSaver

SETUP_POWERSEARCH_KV.EXEPK <
SETUP_INCREDIFIND_ONLY.EXEPK <---
VB6INSTALL.HTMPK
HAUNTED HOUSE HORRORS.SCRPK
HAUNTEDHOUSEEMAIL.EXEPK
ACEZHAUNTEDHOUSE.INIPK

Present HOSTS file entries below, should prevent the INCREDIFIND
parasite from calling out but does not prevent the installation.
POWERSEARCH_KV is 'probably' a NEW commercial trojan. It could
not be found in 'any' HOSTS file so it would try to call out and
perform it's spying mission. It would then be up to your firewall
to stop it. AdAware/SpybotSD/SpyBlaster status for POWERSEARCH_KV
is unknown to me.

127.0.0.1 incredifind.com #[KeenValue/Incredifind]
127.0.0.1 www.incredifind.com

Avast's alert:

C:\Hold\HauntSS\hauntedhouse.exe\SETUP_INCREDIFIND_ONLY.EXE
[L] Win32:Trojan-gen. {Other} (0)
C:\Hold\SkyWrite\skywriter.exe\SETUP_INCREDIFIND_ONLY.EXE
[L] Win32:Trojan-gen. {Other} (0)
Infected files: 2

I selected the virus vault in Avast and rechecked the DL with
Snooper. BOTH Incredifind and PowerSearch exe's were now
missing from the screensaver executable. I had however, lost
all interest in installing the screensavers. :-) :-)

You'll find the reference to KeenValue and PowerSearch here:
http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/KeenValue.html who provide
the infecting programs. Very educational reading.

www.acez.com is not in any domain restricted sites list for IE,
but that is not unusual since as there are 'thousands' of such
sites on the internet.

If anyone finds ANY program, AV or otherwise that will detects
this parasite, PRIOR to installation, I would be interested in
feedback.

PS. Snooper will pull text from any type of file. Other similar
programs are Peek, ArcPeek, etc. Search in Google if you want one.
Great for that final check when nothing alerts, but you are 'still'
suspicious.

Being suspicious of ALL downloads does not mean you are paranoid,
it means you practice SAFEHEX. http://www.claymania.com/safe-hex.html

BoB
For the duration of Swen, my address is inoperative.
 
I will give you 'one' example of why I like Avast!

I DL'd a free but suspicious file. Avast alerted to a trojan,
which actually was 'spyware', a commercial trojan, but still
something I do NOT want on my computer. The parasite was an exe
within an exe but it couldn't hide from Avast. I find Virus, worms,
trojans, etc, are not difficult to avoid if you understand Safehex.
Spyware is more of a problem because there are 'few' preventives.

The simplist and best preventative is to abandon the use of IE. Voila!
No spyware here :) Just say no to both spyware and malware. It's quite
easy to do.


Art
http://www.epix.net/~artnpeg
 
I'm running it and am quite pleased. After it's update last week it
detected a trojan on my machine, that I knew was there (I put it
there-it reports to me) but Norton has, so far, not detected on any of
the other machines i have it running on. Well done, Avast!

Stella

I was planning on installing avast on a friend's computer who did not
have the funds for Norton while I visited them in another city. I
thought I should install it on my own machine just to be familiar with
the install process and options before I visited the friend. I disabled
Norton, installed and tested avast. I planned on not switching to avast
myself until my Norton update subscription expires next May. But avast
was so excellent, that I am leaving it on my PC. One test was with the
eicar test file. Both Norton and Avast pick up this file either on the
HD or when sent through a mail program, either OE Mozilla mail. But
avast could detect the file when it was zipped and then the zip file
zipped. This is the best anti-virus program I have used.

--
Dennis Roark

(e-mail address removed)
Starting Points:
http://sio.midco.net/denro/www
 
SNIP

The simplist and best preventative is to abandon the use of IE. Voila!
No spyware here :) Just say no to both spyware and malware. It's quite
easy to do.

Art
http://www.epix.net/~artnpeg

That's another subject, but absolutely true. However, you're
preaching to the choir, I use Firebird and Agent, and let's not
forget to mention SAFEHEX.

For IE/OE readers of this thread, a helpful tidbit.

Too frequently, MS patches contain 'new' features that are totally
unrelated to patching the latest 'hole', which screws something up,
and you wonder WTF happened.

Latest example:
The latest Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 SP1
(KB824145).

Has Your Scrollbar Behavior Changed? Bizarrely, it's not a bug.
It appears to be a poorly-implemented new "feature".

The vertical scroll bar is now distance sensitive. If you click near
the slider, you'll scroll up or down one screen, as before. If you
click far away from the slider, you'll advance two screens.

The new behavior also is not universal; the change does not affect
all vertical scroll bars in all applications. Now you have to
remember which ones work which way.

If you don't like it, someone has written a personal hack to change
it back, OR you can uninstall the critical update, OR you can wait
for ANOTHER MS patch to fix it. :-)

BoB
For the duration of Swen, my address is inoperative.
 
Gregg Cattanach said:
It is greatly better than AVG (IMO) and it is by far the best free AV
product I've seen.

Does it play nicely on older and slower machines (PII class)?
 
Gregg Cattanach said:
It is greatly better than AVG (IMO) and it is by far the best free AV
product I've seen.

Does it play nicely on older and slower machines (PII class)?

I would expect that Avast would run well on a slow/low memory machine, as it
seems to slow my Athelon-XP down not at all. And you can individually
disable the components that you never use, perhaps P2P and IM and you only
enable one of the 2 e-mail protocols that you use (POP or Exchange). You
only 'run' the parts you need. I also really appreciate the automatic
downloads that senses when I go on-line with my dial-up, checks for updates
without my intervention, and then only downloads the new changes to the
virus database instead of the whole thing. (so it downloads 50K instead of
2MB.)

I'd definitely try it out.

Gregg C.
 
Santa Punk said:
I hardly see anything in here about Avast Antivirus, even though it
seems to be a great program that I have had no trouble with.

Recently, I saw someone posting about how they can't get signature
updates from Avast anymore. I don't seem to be having any problems
getting them, but I was wondering if any other Avast users were
experiencing difficulty getting their signature file updates as well.

According to the page you get when you register Avast for free Home
use:

"The activation key expiration is not limited, but program updates
will only be available for the next 14 months. After this period, it
is necessary to re-register."
 
Back
Top