M
Milhouse Van Houten
I have two drives in the same machine, several inches apart, and regardless
of which is where, the 160GB drive always runs about 10C cooler than the
200GB drive. The 160GB drive runs about 15C above room temperature; the
200GB drive about 25C above room temperature. These temps are from
S.M.A.R.T. data.
What worries me is that Maxtor quotes 55C ("as measured from the top cover
of the drive," which may not be what S.M.A.R.T. is doing) as the magic
number you don't want to exceed, and I'm often within 10C of that right now
with a cool room. In the summer, the room temp will vault 15C, which if
things track linearly, would put the drive temp at 60C. I'm not really sure
what to think about this.
http://tinyurl.com/yqrn7
Since these drives are very similar and of the same generation, the only
thing I can imagine is that it comes down to the platter density, which I've
surmised below based on the serial number method (in which the second digit
of the serial gives you the number of heads).
160GB PATA 6Y160P0 (Sep 2003), Firmware YAR41BW0, Serial Y4... therefore 4
heads, 2 platters each 80GB
200GB SATA 6Y200M0 (Sep 2003), Firmware YAR51BW0, Serial Y6... therefore 6
heads, 3 platters each 68GB
Perhaps if I happened to have the 200GB drive with the 80GB platters, which
I believe should be widely available now, the temp would be more in line
with the other drive?
Thanks
of which is where, the 160GB drive always runs about 10C cooler than the
200GB drive. The 160GB drive runs about 15C above room temperature; the
200GB drive about 25C above room temperature. These temps are from
S.M.A.R.T. data.
What worries me is that Maxtor quotes 55C ("as measured from the top cover
of the drive," which may not be what S.M.A.R.T. is doing) as the magic
number you don't want to exceed, and I'm often within 10C of that right now
with a cool room. In the summer, the room temp will vault 15C, which if
things track linearly, would put the drive temp at 60C. I'm not really sure
what to think about this.
http://tinyurl.com/yqrn7
Since these drives are very similar and of the same generation, the only
thing I can imagine is that it comes down to the platter density, which I've
surmised below based on the serial number method (in which the second digit
of the serial gives you the number of heads).
160GB PATA 6Y160P0 (Sep 2003), Firmware YAR41BW0, Serial Y4... therefore 4
heads, 2 platters each 80GB
200GB SATA 6Y200M0 (Sep 2003), Firmware YAR51BW0, Serial Y6... therefore 6
heads, 3 platters each 68GB
Perhaps if I happened to have the 200GB drive with the 80GB platters, which
I believe should be widely available now, the temp would be more in line
with the other drive?
Thanks