psd99 said:
DEFINETLY
we are all lazier than our previous generations!
god bless the person who set up this vote!
Again... how do you define laziness? Is it as in "not engaging in physical activity"?
or as in, that you enjoy the work you do on your computer & therefore it can't be work?
I have a friend who is an avid hiker & tramper. During the week he slogs it out on a computer in an office. To have to do the same when he would much rather be off, mucking around, having fun in the hills would be horrible hard work. So would he be being lazy doing that computer work? Or is it only defined as 'work & therefore not being lazy' because he doesn't want to be doing it? & how come his hiking is not seen as being lazy simply because he is engaging in physical activity? He is off, having fun, pursueing an activity that achieves nothing but his own enjoyment... just like I am when I play on my computer. And when I'm working on my computer (as opposed to playing) Yhat sure as **ll is not being lazy. It is hard & often exhausting work. So, how do you define being lazy?
Myself, I would define laziness as.
Leaving what you are obligated to do for someone else to do & when something NEEDS to be done & you don't do it.
Myself I would say that, however much we enjoy playing on our computers, most of do still manage to pay the rent, feed the wife/husband/kids, get the dishes done, prepare our own assgnments for school/university, etc... whatever our own obligations (to ourselves & others) and requirements for life happen to be, we manage to get them done. We may have moments when we 'can't be bothered, everyone does. But for the most part we get them done. Therefore we are not lazy. We are survivors in our own jungle (because believe me, even here & now, "the lazy gazelle becomes lion food"(quote NJ Kendrick).)