J
James A. Fortune
In PDC 08 session TL21: WF 4.0: Extending with Custom Activities, Matt
Winkler demo'ed a parallel workflow and mentioned "I/O Completion
Ports." I admit my ignorance of never having heard of them before
that.
From the MSDN entry for 'I/O Completion Ports':
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365198(v=vs.85).aspx
"Processes that handle many concurrent asynchronous I/O requests can
do so more quickly and efficiently by using I/O completion ports in
conjunction with a pre-allocated thread pool than by creating threads
at the time they receive an I/O request."
In one of the links from that entry:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2010/12/20/10107027.aspx
The first commenter (Anton Tykhyy) says:
"The .NET framework uses this trick when it does asynchronous I/O."
Is using I/O Completion Ports in conjunction with a thread pool in C#
a good idea? If so, is using C++ the best way to implement I/O
Completion Ports?
Thanks in advance,
James A. Fortune
(e-mail address removed)
Winkler demo'ed a parallel workflow and mentioned "I/O Completion
Ports." I admit my ignorance of never having heard of them before
that.
From the MSDN entry for 'I/O Completion Ports':
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365198(v=vs.85).aspx
"Processes that handle many concurrent asynchronous I/O requests can
do so more quickly and efficiently by using I/O completion ports in
conjunction with a pre-allocated thread pool than by creating threads
at the time they receive an I/O request."
In one of the links from that entry:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2010/12/20/10107027.aspx
The first commenter (Anton Tykhyy) says:
"The .NET framework uses this trick when it does asynchronous I/O."
Is using I/O Completion Ports in conjunction with a thread pool in C#
a good idea? If so, is using C++ the best way to implement I/O
Completion Ports?
Thanks in advance,
James A. Fortune
(e-mail address removed)