G
Ghad Von Bueler
I have a Windows 2000 server w/ AD, DNS, DHCP that serves
our Windows desktops (2000, XP, etc..). We also have
some Unix machines which have DNS records setup in the
Win2K DNS server.
The DHCP server gives clients itself as a DNS server, as
well as an externel DNS server.
Occasionally this happens:
----
C:\>nslookup host1
Server: server.domain.com
Address: 192.168.0.11
Name: host1.domain.com
Address: 192.168.0.58
C:\>ping host1
Unknown host host1.
C:\>ipconfig /flushdns
Windows 2000 IP Configuration
Successfully flushed the DNS Resolver Cache.
C:\>ping host1
Pinging host1.domain.com [192.168.0.58] with 32 bytes of
data:
----
My theory: The client machine tries to lookup host1 and
for some reason queries the externel DNS server instead
of our internal Win2K machine. It then stores this info
in it's DNS cache.
Would only handing out one DNS server to DHCP clients fix
this? If so, WHY is this happening? Is this a Windows
desktop problem? I have similar networks running Unix
name servers with Windows desktops addressing both
internal and external machines and have never seen this
cache problem.
Thanks!
our Windows desktops (2000, XP, etc..). We also have
some Unix machines which have DNS records setup in the
Win2K DNS server.
The DHCP server gives clients itself as a DNS server, as
well as an externel DNS server.
Occasionally this happens:
----
C:\>nslookup host1
Server: server.domain.com
Address: 192.168.0.11
Name: host1.domain.com
Address: 192.168.0.58
C:\>ping host1
Unknown host host1.
C:\>ipconfig /flushdns
Windows 2000 IP Configuration
Successfully flushed the DNS Resolver Cache.
C:\>ping host1
Pinging host1.domain.com [192.168.0.58] with 32 bytes of
data:
----
My theory: The client machine tries to lookup host1 and
for some reason queries the externel DNS server instead
of our internal Win2K machine. It then stores this info
in it's DNS cache.
Would only handing out one DNS server to DHCP clients fix
this? If so, WHY is this happening? Is this a Windows
desktop problem? I have similar networks running Unix
name servers with Windows desktops addressing both
internal and external machines and have never seen this
cache problem.
Thanks!