P
philo
a friend of mine had been using an amd-1000 with a wd-80gig hd and it
was working ok.
he recently purchased a wd-200gig drive and did a clean install of XP...
then called me becasue the machine was running exceedingly slow...
and something was using 80% cpu resources.
upon checing it out...
in the control panel...
although the drive was set for "use dma if available"...
it was running in the pio mode.
even though the wd utility confirmed that it was set for dma-5
(and the diagnostic utility gave it a clean bill of health)
and the bios saw it as dma-5...the os saw it as pio
i then had the idea to put back the original 80gig drive and slave the
200 gig to it...
and the OS still saw the 200gig drive as pio.
finally we slaved an older 40 gig drive to the machine and it was
correctly seen as running in the dma mode.
does this look like the 200gig drive has some type of defect?
i can't think of anything else at this point.
was working ok.
he recently purchased a wd-200gig drive and did a clean install of XP...
then called me becasue the machine was running exceedingly slow...
and something was using 80% cpu resources.
upon checing it out...
in the control panel...
although the drive was set for "use dma if available"...
it was running in the pio mode.
even though the wd utility confirmed that it was set for dma-5
(and the diagnostic utility gave it a clean bill of health)
and the bios saw it as dma-5...the os saw it as pio
i then had the idea to put back the original 80gig drive and slave the
200 gig to it...
and the OS still saw the 200gig drive as pio.
finally we slaved an older 40 gig drive to the machine and it was
correctly seen as running in the dma mode.
does this look like the 200gig drive has some type of defect?
i can't think of anything else at this point.