Disk Speed Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pat
  • Start date Start date
P

Pat

I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA is
On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive and
its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the make
and model of the drive.
 
Pat said:
I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA is
On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive and
its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the make
and model of the drive.
Click to expand...

Thanks, very informative.
 
Joep said:
Thanks, very informative.
Click to expand...


Ooooops!

QUESTION:

Are there 7200 RPM 80 GB hard drives with very slow average access times
above 20MS?

If not, what could possible cause a slow benchmark result like that?

Thanks,

Pat
 
Pat said:
Are there 7200 RPM 80 GB hard drives with
very slow average access times above 20MS?
Nope.

If not, what could possible cause a slow benchmark result like that?
Click to expand...

diskspeed32 is a steaming turd, not a benchmark.

HDTach is much better but it isnt free unless you've got the drive formatted fat32.
 
Pat said:
Ooooops!

QUESTION:

Are there 7200 RPM 80 GB hard drives with very slow average access times
above 20MS?

If not, what could possible cause a slow benchmark result like that?

Thanks,

Pat
Click to expand...

If you want reliable results from a HD benchmark, then you must run it
standalone; sharing the CPU+OS with other processes can contaminate
the results. And, run the benchmark a few times to verify that your
results are consistent -- inconsistent results should be ignored, and
you should try to understand what is causing non-repeatable results.
 
Bob WIllard said:
If you want reliable results from a HD benchmark, then you must run it
standalone; sharing the CPU+OS with other processes can contaminate
the results. And, run the benchmark a few times to verify that your
results are consistent -- inconsistent results should be ignored, and
you should try to understand what is causing non-repeatable results.
Click to expand...

Please enlighten us, what do we use?
 
Hi! http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach

With version 2.7 they give access to read-operation on WinXP/2000 systems
under NTFS. Works fine here.
Click to expand...



Hello,

thanks for posting that link. I been meaning to download HDTach for weeks
now (busy, busy). I been wanting to benchmark my SATA RAID-0 set-up and I
hear HDTach is pretty reliable (Rod Speed!). . .
--
Wayne ][

Barton (AQXEA) XP2500+ @ 2.2GHz (10x220) - 1.775vCore
CoolerMaster Aero 7 Lite - 3,200rpm
ABIT NF7-S (v2.0 - BIOS#14)
512MB Dual TwiSTER PC3500 @ DDR440 1:1 (9,4,4,2.0 - 2.7v)
Sapphire Atlantis 9800 - 3.3ns Samsung (325/290 Default)
240GB (2x120GB) WD-SE SATA RAID-0 (16k Stripe)
Antec SX630II Mini-Tower Case Inc 300w PSU
2 x CoolerMaster 80mm Blue Neon Fans
WinXP-PRO-SP1
Cat 3.7 - DX9.0b
 
Back
Top