C
cmashieldscapting
So I needed some enlargements right away of 35 mm film pictures, all on
negatives, some on photo CDs, some not. I have two printers supposed
to be superior for photography, an Epson Stylus Photo RX500 and a Canon
Pixma ip 5200 I just bought (after extensive questioning here)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....ad/6ee9f0107aa83b7c/cd35079bd72a38dd?lnk=st&q
for the purpose of printing directly to disks, to make a better-looking
product than plain Sharpie-scrawled disks and quicker and
better-looking than Lightscribe disks.
Usually if I want enlargements I just go to Wal-Mart or Rite Aid. But
Wal-Mart's negative scanner was busted so they could do only digital
prints, and I'd brought only the negatives, not the CDs, with me, and
the Rite-Aid guy said I "might get the pictures by the middle of the
day tomorrow...or not." I needed them right away and didn't have time
to learn iPhoto or however it is you manage and print out photos from a
Mac, so appealed to a friend who's done a lot of this. My friend had a
lot of trouble with his negative scanner, but seemed to have no problem
with the printer. Some of the pictures looked almost as good as
Wal-Mart's, some better, some not as good.
By the time I got them home and mounted, EVERY SINGLE ONE was
scratched, from mildly to severely, just from regular handling! One
also had a fingerprint. The handling was extremely careful and MILD
compared to the abuse a Wal-Mart print will take! I am talking not,
they can be scratched with a fingernail, but the merest BRUSH with a
fingernail took the color right off!
So my questions are:
1. Is this "to be expected" in all such cases? That is, are the
products of all photo printers this cheap, or did my friend do
something wrong? (Sorry, I don't know his brand of printer but
*assumed* that because his Mac was bigger, better, and did more
state-of-the-art things than mine, that his printer would be
professional grade--I can ask. I also don't know the brand of paper
but it looked like nice, probably matte, photo paper.)
2. Can I expect the same from the picture CDs I plan to make?
3. If so, is there any way to prevent it?
I will be in no way ready to print picture CDs anytime soon. First I
have to edit massive amounts of footage and then format to burn it to
DVD. When finished, I don't want a product that's going to come off
all over a user's hands the first time they pick up the disk! Is there
any fixative or other product or process to use during or after
applying the picture to the disk, to prevent such sad consequences?
As always, thanks for any help or advice.
Cori
negatives, some on photo CDs, some not. I have two printers supposed
to be superior for photography, an Epson Stylus Photo RX500 and a Canon
Pixma ip 5200 I just bought (after extensive questioning here)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....ad/6ee9f0107aa83b7c/cd35079bd72a38dd?lnk=st&q
for the purpose of printing directly to disks, to make a better-looking
product than plain Sharpie-scrawled disks and quicker and
better-looking than Lightscribe disks.
Usually if I want enlargements I just go to Wal-Mart or Rite Aid. But
Wal-Mart's negative scanner was busted so they could do only digital
prints, and I'd brought only the negatives, not the CDs, with me, and
the Rite-Aid guy said I "might get the pictures by the middle of the
day tomorrow...or not." I needed them right away and didn't have time
to learn iPhoto or however it is you manage and print out photos from a
Mac, so appealed to a friend who's done a lot of this. My friend had a
lot of trouble with his negative scanner, but seemed to have no problem
with the printer. Some of the pictures looked almost as good as
Wal-Mart's, some better, some not as good.
By the time I got them home and mounted, EVERY SINGLE ONE was
scratched, from mildly to severely, just from regular handling! One
also had a fingerprint. The handling was extremely careful and MILD
compared to the abuse a Wal-Mart print will take! I am talking not,
they can be scratched with a fingernail, but the merest BRUSH with a
fingernail took the color right off!
So my questions are:
1. Is this "to be expected" in all such cases? That is, are the
products of all photo printers this cheap, or did my friend do
something wrong? (Sorry, I don't know his brand of printer but
*assumed* that because his Mac was bigger, better, and did more
state-of-the-art things than mine, that his printer would be
professional grade--I can ask. I also don't know the brand of paper
but it looked like nice, probably matte, photo paper.)
2. Can I expect the same from the picture CDs I plan to make?
3. If so, is there any way to prevent it?
I will be in no way ready to print picture CDs anytime soon. First I
have to edit massive amounts of footage and then format to burn it to
DVD. When finished, I don't want a product that's going to come off
all over a user's hands the first time they pick up the disk! Is there
any fixative or other product or process to use during or after
applying the picture to the disk, to prevent such sad consequences?
As always, thanks for any help or advice.
Cori