DISK BURN vs DISK COPY?

  • Thread starter Thread starter its_my_dime
  • Start date Start date
I

its_my_dime

Can someone kindly explain the difference between copying a disk (using disk
copy) and burning a disk image to a second disk. When would you use one in
preference to the other?

Thank you
 
Can someone kindly explain the difference between copying a disk (using disk
copy) and burning a disk image to a second disk. When would you use one in
preference to the other?

First: there is a difference between the terms "copy" and "burn",
unless you're talking about copying/burning to optical media. Are you?

Your turn.

DDW
 
DDW said:
First: there is a difference between the terms "copy" and "burn",
unless you're talking about copying/burning to optical media. Are you?

Your turn.

DDW

Just a standard CD-DVD player/burner. And I'm talking about CD's, not
DVD's.

Thank you.
 
Just a standard CD-DVD player/burner. And I'm talking about CD's, not
DVD's.

"Copying" burns the files to the media in uncompressed form that you
can access with Explorer.

"Burning an image" burns everything into a single compressed file
that would probably require a proprietary browser (related to the
software you use to do the imaging) to access.

DDW
 
its_my_dime said:
Just a standard CD-DVD player/burner. And I'm talking about CD's, not
DVD's.

Thank you.


CD or DVD makes no difference..

Disk copy from one CD/DVD to another. The entire contents are copied such
that both are identical at the end of the process..

Burning an image to a CD/DVD. Generally, the image file type is 'ISO', and
the process converts the ISO file to a bootable form on the recipient
CD/DVD.




--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
 
DDW said:
"Copying" burns the files to the media in uncompressed form that you
can access with Explorer.

"Burning an image" burns everything into a single compressed file
that would probably require a proprietary browser (related to the
software you use to do the imaging) to access.

DDW
--

Wrong, Kojak. An image, ahh, never mind. I doubt you'd get it :(
 
DDW said:
"Copying" burns the files to the media in uncompressed form that you
can access with Explorer.

"Burning an image" burns everything into a single compressed file
that would probably require a proprietary browser (related to the
software you use to do the imaging) to access.

Crap.

Burning an image is the same as copying the entire disk. It doesn't put
everything into a single compressed file, and it does not have anything to
do with browsers (proprietary or otherwise).
 
Back
Top