Trick said:
2) Your list is not clear about the item for naming where MS changed the
default from 'MSHome' on XP to 'Workgroup' on Vista. Are you saying you
did
that to the XPs? If not, try renaming XP machine network to 'Workgroup'.
Plus there is a download patch needed for XPs see link below.
3) I've found I need to turn on the XPs then the Vista machine after
running
thru all the items from this very helpful link from another thread here
("only way to connect to vista with xp"):
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/evaluate/vista_fp.mspx
Trick,
2. As long as workgroup names are common it should be fine. I don't use
either of the default workgroup names for Vista or XP. My workgroup name is
Camelot on all 4 networked machines with a DLink DI-624 WPA2/PSK enabled
router. Two desktop ethernet connections with Vista Ultimate RTM and Vista
Pre-Release(5840) from the Vista Launch event. The latter in a dual boot
with XP Pro. The other two machines are two wireless Micron laptops XP Pro
and XP Home)
- What patch were you referring that is needed for XP ? If its the the
LLTD, its only needed for showing the network map; not required for
connecting or networking.
3. Not sure of the machine sequence either..it works both ways for me..it
does take a bit longer for the XP Home wireless laptop to find the two Vista
machines. But the sequence seems not to matter. If the laptops are placed in
standby their DLink DWL-G630 card(s) eventually finds it, but it can be
hastened by accessing the Network icon/View Available Networks/Connect
button/and entry of the passkey if prompted.
Vista is setup as
Network Discovery On
File Sharing On
Public Folder Sharing On
Printer Sharing On(Printer is connected via USB to the dual boot Vista/XP
Pro machine)
Password Protected Sharing On
Media Sharing On
At least one non public folder is shared on each Vista machine, multiple
folders on each XP machine.
Each machine has a unique user profile/pw and a unique computer name. No
profiles are duplicated on any machine.
Each Vista machine non public folder is set up for simple file sharing,
permission for the respective machines unique user profile(owner) and
Guest/co-owner.
Router is setup to dispense only four ip addresses, setup for mac address
filter to only allow for the 4 machine's ip address. For the wireless units
Wpa2/psk 63 hex key encryption, unique SSID name, SSID broadcast off, and a
different channel.
I first used/created common profiles(username/pw on the machines) but
decided since it is a private home network and nothing was sacred amongst
the machines or users to use the Guest approach and password sharing. This
saved the 10MB of wasted space for the seldom used profiles.
Someone might say its not as secure with the Guest approach..but I'm still
waiting for someone to give me a concrete reason to change it back to common
profiles across machines with the above setup, or a different method that
just as simple. I am open to all suggestions.
On first access by any machine from a Vista unit to an XP Pro unit or vice
versa the username/password for the respective machine being accessed is
required. Accesssing the XP Home machine does not require a username/pw it
just connects.
Additionally, all units can see the external usb drives on each Vista
Desktop
unit and share their folders but not the root of the drive(not sure how if I
can do that..maybe that's another thread or has been answered already).
....winston