Differnce between migrating and upgrading

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

do u have an article to determine the difference between upgrading and
migrating windows 2000 to windows 2003
 
Really quickly, in upgrading you simply drop in the WIN2003 Server CD and
let 'er rip. Obviously very simplified - but that is the jist of it. In
migrating you would probably be using a tool like the ADMT v2. In this
situation you have completely different hardware and you 'migrate' user
account objects et al from the 'source' domain to the 'destination' domain.

--
Cary W. Shultz
Roanoke, VA 24012
Microsoft Active Directory MVP

http://www.activedirectory-win2000.com
http://www.grouppolicy-win2000.com
 
in migrating all the configuration of the old domain will transfer to the new
one like TCP/ip Configuration, member server that i am not going to upgrade
it will also connected to the new domain like exchange server ISA server
 
mohey said:
do u have an article to determine the difference between upgrading and
migrating windows 2000 to windows 2003
Click to expand...

Upgrading is almost always better.

Why? You don't end up with "new" users and computrs accounts
(new SIDs) and security settings.

If you have any choice in the matter then upgrade.
 
mohey said:
in migrating all the configuration of the old domain will transfer to the new
one like TCP/ip Configuration, member server that i am not going to upgrade
it will also connected to the new domain like exchange server ISA server
Click to expand...

No, in migration you do all of that stuff by hand
usually.

In upgrading their is nothing to transfer -- you just
upgrade.

You really want to UPGRADE.
 
Back
Top