H
Harvey Gratt
Can someone please supply a precise definition of each and what the
differences are?
Thanks,
Harvey
differences are?
Thanks,
Harvey
Can someone please supply a precise definition of each
and what the differences are?
Thanks.
Are there size differences between the two formats
(image vs disk, i.e., is the image a compressed file,
is the clone a compressed file
or does it retain a file structure, does the clone need to have
the same file structure, NTFS, FAT32 as the original disk)?
What would be the advantage of one over the other?
Can individual files be extracted from a clone?
Rod said:A disk image is a file or set of files that contain all the
data from the disk its an image of. It can also be an image
of just a partition, rather than the entire physical disk.
An image needs to be restored to a physical drive before it can
be used, tho most imaging programs do provide some way to
browse images so that individual files can be extracted etc.
A clone is an exact copy of a disk, to another physical disk.
Thanks again. I appreciate you taking the time to
answer. One more question concerning the clone
file structure - my original question was not clear:
If my external HDD is formatted as FAT32, can
I clone a disk which has its OS as NTFS or do I
need to make an NTFS partition on the external HDD.
In that case, what Ghost calls a clone is not really a clone, since
it reorders clusters and can act between disks of different sizes.
Something like dd would be the only software
that creates clones under that definition.
If my external HDD is formatted as FAT32, can I clone a disk which has
its OS as NTFS or do I need to make an NTFS partition on the external
HDD. Or, would the cloning software convert the NTFS to FAT32 (if so,
I guess I lose the NTFSF formmating for later use).
CJT said:In that case, what Ghost calls a clone is not really a clone,
since it reorders clusters and can act between disks of different
sizes.
Timothy Daniels said:Harvey Gratt wrote.
Cloning implies a byte-for-byte copy of a drive (logical or physical),
and that implies a copy of the formatting as well.
So a clone has the same formatting as the original.
Timothy Daniels said:CJT wrote
He meant "drive" - either logical or physical - instead of "disk"
Rod Speed said:Nope. Its also a term used to cover a clone
that produces an operationally identical drive.
Like hell I did.
Timothy Daniels said:Rod Speed wrote
How can a byte-for-byte copy (implying a copy of the
master boot record as well) *not* be operationally identical,
Timothy Daniels said:Rod Speed wrote
You should have.
Several logical drives can reside
on a physical disk and be bootable,
and each can be independently cloned
to a partition on the same or another disk,
resulting in another bootable logical drive that
is operationally identical to the cloned drive.