The Internet is, as Eric Schmidt of Google said, a cesspool.
Imbeciles like R.C. White seek out people to target, and to start
flame wars. The Web is full of them.
These things are quite inappropriate on a thread such as this.
He has no knowledge. He is just being malicious.
Here is a quote from the URL I gave you:
-------------------------------------
QUOTE
System Update Readiness Tool for Windows Vista (KB947821) [August
2008]
This tool is being offered because an inconsistency was found in the
Windows servicing store which may prevent the successful installation
of future updates, service packs, and software.
UNQUOTE
------------------------------------
There are many, many more of this kind of thing.
It is exactly what I am talking about. It is an "Update" that is said
to address an "inconsistency" which "may" prevent the successful
installation of future "Updates".
The "inconsistency" stops this "Update" from being successfully
installed.
So this "Update" does not allow "future Updates" to install.
Note that without this tool, "Updates", "Service Packs" and "software"
do not install successfully.
So the flaky software is NOT flaky. It is software that has BECOME
flaky due to the inability of Vista to install it. It becomes flaky
within the machine, but is good software on the original disk.
I have found this to be true over and over again, with the best
software on the best machines, but with Vista.
The first thing to do is to take the machine completely off line. See
if it "configures" the "Updates". If it does, that means it is acting
as if going onto the Internet without this being possible.
The "configuring of Updates" is always accompanied by a crash.
Sometimes it reboots, sometimes it switches the machine completely
off. I have evidence that this crash is due to the fake "configuring"
spraying random bytes at random into memory.
So if you have this experience, SWITCH THE UPDATES OFF. You will be
spared the inconvenience of the unexpected crashes, and due to the
spraying of random bytes being stopped, the system will be more
stable.
It took five days before it "noticed" that I had asked for the
"Updates" to be disabled. Then it behaved better.
As regards software, DO NOT USE THE INSTALLATION WIZARD. The software
that I use is old, tried and tested. I create a directory, and simply
put the EXE and all its accompanying parts, like DLLs in. Then I click
on the EXE icon. Usually it runs.
A brand new Lexmark printer, installed with the "Wizard" on a brand
new Vista computer, connected itself to COM1. However, neither the
printer nor the computer had a COM1 facility. What is worse, it
altered various inventories.
Putting software in, rather than installing, will prevent Vista
digging too deep into the system and getting things wrong.
Here is Chris Crum's report on why the White House will not use Vista
(it is BUGGY, CLUNKY, ANNOYING)
The Internet is, as Eric Schmidt of Google said, a cesspool.
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/01/23/addressing-the-state-of-the-white-house-technology
As for the Anorak who "knows it all", he has been chasing me around
the Internet. I have come across hundreds of thousands of people with
Vista problems, and tried to share experience of dealing with it with,
one or two. This malicious individual keeps popping up to lower the
tone of the discussion.
Charles Douglas Wehner