I
Ian Baldwin
This is more of a plea than a question in the hope that
someone at microsoft is monitoring this newsgroup.
However, if my facts are wrong I would welcome correction.
The plea: please, please, please can updates, especially
critical updates, be provided as msi files such that they
can be deployed through AD group policies? Windows 2000
provides the facility, but Microsoft doesn't use it for
the most important updates to their operating system
(Service Packs are provided like this and easily
deployed). By making it so difficult for the user
community to deploy updates, I frankly believe that MS
deserves any denial of service aimed at it by this route.
In fact, it deserves far worse.
"Use Windows Update or SUS", they (ie MS) tell us. But
users must have administrative rights for that which makes
a mockery of all those lovely security facilities on
Windows 2000 clients - I might as well have Windows 95!
So then there's SMS, but isn't that a bit of an over-kill
if you only want it for patches?
I've spent hours applying, or trying to apply, updates.
Wasted hours. Do I rant and rave at the pimply-faced
little nerds that create the viruses that I'm having to
protect my network against? No. I'm sorry Microsoft but I
blame you entirely. I accept that software is going to
have faults, I'm grateful for the free updates so easily
available, but please make it easy for us to apply them
over a large network.
Ian
someone at microsoft is monitoring this newsgroup.
However, if my facts are wrong I would welcome correction.
The plea: please, please, please can updates, especially
critical updates, be provided as msi files such that they
can be deployed through AD group policies? Windows 2000
provides the facility, but Microsoft doesn't use it for
the most important updates to their operating system
(Service Packs are provided like this and easily
deployed). By making it so difficult for the user
community to deploy updates, I frankly believe that MS
deserves any denial of service aimed at it by this route.
In fact, it deserves far worse.
"Use Windows Update or SUS", they (ie MS) tell us. But
users must have administrative rights for that which makes
a mockery of all those lovely security facilities on
Windows 2000 clients - I might as well have Windows 95!
So then there's SMS, but isn't that a bit of an over-kill
if you only want it for patches?
I've spent hours applying, or trying to apply, updates.
Wasted hours. Do I rant and rave at the pimply-faced
little nerds that create the viruses that I'm having to
protect my network against? No. I'm sorry Microsoft but I
blame you entirely. I accept that software is going to
have faults, I'm grateful for the free updates so easily
available, but please make it easy for us to apply them
over a large network.
Ian