J
jimt
We are considering the following scenario, and would appreciate any feedback
on
this approach. One hard disk drive contains two bootable partitions and a
disk
based EWF partition with an EWF volume and up to 9 EWF disk overlays.
Either
of the first two partitions could be booted, each as C:\, and the other
partition would be D:.
For the first case, partition #1 is C: and partition #2 is D:
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)
...partition(1) XPe w/Disk-EWF, mounted as C:,
bootvolume
...partition(2) XPe w/Disk-EWF, mounted as D: Data
volume
...partition(3) EWF Partition (EWF Volume + Overlays)
And for the alternate boot case partition #2 is the boot volume at C:\ and
partition #1 is a data volume at D:...
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)
...partition(1) XPe w/Disk-EWF, Data drive, D:\
...partition(2) XPe w/Disk-EWF, Boot volume, C:\
...partition(3) EWF Partition (EWF Volume + Overlays)
The dual-boot target would permit our installers to back up to the prior
install if the primary install fails. This scenario is:
[a] Partition #1 is running XPe + app, with EWF protection + disk overlays.
Time to upgrade; format Partition #2; install new XPe+APP onto
Partition #2
[c] Change Partition #2 to be primary active partition with it's own
boot.ini
[d] Partition #2 is booted as C:\ with same EWF partition as "the" new os
[e] Operator observes that the Partition #2 upgrade has failed horribly.
[f] Operator reverts back to booting Partition #1 with it's old overlays
Questions:
1. Can both boot partitions be known as C:\ using just one XPe image?
Seems like \WINDOWS, \Program Files, and \Documents and Settings would
all be C:\ from their TD settings. Should work?
2. Will partition #1's EWF disk overlays still be there to revert back to
in
step [f] of the scenario?
3. Any other issues come to mind?
Thank you,
on
this approach. One hard disk drive contains two bootable partitions and a
disk
based EWF partition with an EWF volume and up to 9 EWF disk overlays.
Either
of the first two partitions could be booted, each as C:\, and the other
partition would be D:.
For the first case, partition #1 is C: and partition #2 is D:
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)
...partition(1) XPe w/Disk-EWF, mounted as C:,
bootvolume
...partition(2) XPe w/Disk-EWF, mounted as D: Data
volume
...partition(3) EWF Partition (EWF Volume + Overlays)
And for the alternate boot case partition #2 is the boot volume at C:\ and
partition #1 is a data volume at D:...
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)
...partition(1) XPe w/Disk-EWF, Data drive, D:\
...partition(2) XPe w/Disk-EWF, Boot volume, C:\
...partition(3) EWF Partition (EWF Volume + Overlays)
The dual-boot target would permit our installers to back up to the prior
install if the primary install fails. This scenario is:
[a] Partition #1 is running XPe + app, with EWF protection + disk overlays.
Time to upgrade; format Partition #2; install new XPe+APP onto
Partition #2
[c] Change Partition #2 to be primary active partition with it's own
boot.ini
[d] Partition #2 is booted as C:\ with same EWF partition as "the" new os
[e] Operator observes that the Partition #2 upgrade has failed horribly.
[f] Operator reverts back to booting Partition #1 with it's old overlays
Questions:
1. Can both boot partitions be known as C:\ using just one XPe image?
Seems like \WINDOWS, \Program Files, and \Documents and Settings would
all be C:\ from their TD settings. Should work?
2. Will partition #1's EWF disk overlays still be there to revert back to
in
step [f] of the scenario?
3. Any other issues come to mind?
Thank you,