Taffycat
Crunchy Cat
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 12,830
- Reaction score
- 1,067
My question is about defragging and basically concerns Auslogics vs Defraggler.
For a while, I've been using Auslogics, which does the job pretty quickly, not taking more than about 10 minutes or so. But today, I decided to try Defraggler (from the makers of CCleaner) and it took an age.... despite having defragged just a week or so ago.
So, what is the experts' opinion on this, does the speed of the operation have any bearing on the result? It's tempting to feel that it must be making a more accurage job of things if it's taking lots of time.... but on the other hand, is it just being a "jobsworthy" trying to look fussy and busy but not really achieving anything spectacular?
It would be interesting to know, thank you for looking.
For a while, I've been using Auslogics, which does the job pretty quickly, not taking more than about 10 minutes or so. But today, I decided to try Defraggler (from the makers of CCleaner) and it took an age.... despite having defragged just a week or so ago.
So, what is the experts' opinion on this, does the speed of the operation have any bearing on the result? It's tempting to feel that it must be making a more accurage job of things if it's taking lots of time.... but on the other hand, is it just being a "jobsworthy" trying to look fussy and busy but not really achieving anything spectacular?
It would be interesting to know, thank you for looking.