J
JOE
better than microsoft for WinXP
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
G
George Richards
JOE said:better than microsoft for WinXP
Some people have liked Diskeeper Lite
http://www.webattack.com/get/dkeeperlite.html . I on the other hand have
been happy with the Disk Defragmenter that came with WinXP.
HTH
J
John Campbell
Diskeeper Lite is based on the XP defrag engine, but doesn't seem to
offer anything better. Indeed some of the functionality is disabled.
However, it is by far the best option I have found for my Windows 98
set up, as Miscrosoft's defrag locks up the system, and all other
offerings I have tried lock it up, with some damaging the hard disk
system data as well. Don't know why, but there you go.
offer anything better. Indeed some of the functionality is disabled.
However, it is by far the best option I have found for my Windows 98
set up, as Miscrosoft's defrag locks up the system, and all other
offerings I have tried lock it up, with some damaging the hard disk
system data as well. Don't know why, but there you go.
H
H-Man
John Campbell said:Diskeeper Lite is based on the XP defrag engine, but doesn't seem to
offer anything better. Indeed some of the functionality is disabled.
SNIP<
Actually it's the other way around, the XP defragger is actually a MS
version of Executive Software's Diskeeper Lite. Microsoft has never released
a defragger of their own, they've always bought someone elses and packaged
it with their OS. This particular defragger (in earlier versions) has been
around since NT4, using the MS Management Console interface.
HK
HK
A
AnYoNe
or O&O Defrag 2000 Freeware (search Google)George said:Some people have liked Diskeeper Lite
http://www.webattack.com/get/dkeeperlite.html . I on the other hand have
been happy with the Disk Defragmenter that came with WinXP.
HTH