J
jackalope
I've read of the advantages to splitting a database into a
front end and back end, with the data being stored on the
network and the forms, etc. stored on the client PCs.
However, in our case we have a database that is used by
only 3 users, two of whom are secretaries with neither the
knowledge nor the time to make their own forms, reports,
etc. If there is a specific report they need, they ask me
to do it for them, which is part of my job.
Given that, is there any advantage to splitting the
database? If so, is there any problem with putting the
two "ends" on the server but in separate places? That way
I can make updates to the structure that is automatically
available to all three of us. Any thoughts on this?
front end and back end, with the data being stored on the
network and the forms, etc. stored on the client PCs.
However, in our case we have a database that is used by
only 3 users, two of whom are secretaries with neither the
knowledge nor the time to make their own forms, reports,
etc. If there is a specific report they need, they ask me
to do it for them, which is part of my job.
Given that, is there any advantage to splitting the
database? If so, is there any problem with putting the
two "ends" on the server but in separate places? That way
I can make updates to the structure that is automatically
available to all three of us. Any thoughts on this?