Da vote

  • Thread starter Thread starter Susan Bugher
  • Start date Start date
S

Susan Bugher

vsj said:
Susan Bugher wrote
Click to expand...
Thanks, Susan. A lot of hard work there.
Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly. Wow. Thanks, Susan.


It is interesting to see which kinds of apps get relatively few votes and which
get a lot. I would have expected it to relate more closely to the general
"usefulness" of the app (as opposed to "very specialized interest tool").


My next thought is for the recognition that Irfan is getting for his great app,
as well as the authors of Ad-Aware and Spybot. Well deserved.
I hope we will find a way to help them get some mileage out of this result.
(Without letting too much "business interest" seep in! I shudder at the though
of the ramifications of it)

Susan, do you have some "protected" label for Pricelessware?
(And is anyone competent on how to go about those things? Not me, unfortunately)

DAN
 
My thoughts exactly. Wow. Thanks, Susan.


It is interesting to see which kinds of apps get relatively few votes and which
get a lot. I would have expected it to relate more closely to the general
"usefulness" of the app (as opposed to "very specialized interest tool").


My next thought is for the recognition that Irfan is getting for his great app,
as well as the authors of Ad-Aware and Spybot. Well deserved.
I hope we will find a way to help them get some mileage out of this result.
(Without letting too much "business interest" seep in! I shudder at the though
of the ramifications of it)

Susan, do you have some "protected" label for Pricelessware?
(And is anyone competent on how to go about those things? Not me,
Click to expand...
unfortunately)
</snip>

Could you explain a little more as to what you mean by "protected label"?
(I've not long gotten out of bed, so my braincells aren't functioning at
full speed yet).

--

Regards

Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group
www.it-mate.co.uk

Keeping it FREE!

Disclaimer:
I know I'm probably wrong, I just like taking part ;o)
 
Could you explain a little more as to what you mean by "protected label"?
(I've not long gotten out of bed, so my braincells aren't functioning at
full speed yet).
Click to expand...

Some form of protection like trademark or copyright (or whatever) that prevents
misuse by unauthorized parties.
DAN
 
Some form of protection like trademark or copyright (or whatever) that prevents
misuse by unauthorized parties.
DAN
Click to expand...

Are you talking about the list, or the programs themselves?

--

Regards

Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group
www.it-mate.co.uk

Keeping it FREE!

Disclaimer:
I know I'm probably wrong, I just like taking part ;o)
 
It is interesting to see which kinds of apps get relatively few votes and which
get a lot. I would have expected it to relate more closely to the general
"usefulness" of the app (as opposed to "very specialized interest tool").
Click to expand...

IMO it does relate to genereal usefulness - the total votes in the
browser categories (120+) are close to the total votes in the graphics
viewer category (96+). OTOH I suspect that ACF as a whole is more geeky
than the general public - so some categories that are well liked here
might not be as interesting to everyone . . .

I *love* Lars script! I've just been browsing the Nominations page -
sorted in vote order, then sorted by category, then looked at the yes/no
votes re: acceptability vs. the votes *for* the programs, then . . .
Susan, do you have some "protected" label for Pricelessware?
(And is anyone competent on how to go about those things? Not me, unfortunately)
Click to expand...

Genna purchased the pricelessware.org domain name - IIRC
pricelessware.net was already taken . . .

I *think* in the US *Pricelessware List* has some copyright protection
automatically - IOW I don't think someone can *legally* use the same
name in the same way . . . for whatever that's worth . . .

Susan
--
Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org
PL2003: http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/about2003PL.htm
PL2004 Review: http://www.pricelessware.org/2004/2004nominationsPL.php
alt.comp.freeware FAQ (short) - maintained by John F.
http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/faq.html
 
I *think* in the US *Pricelessware List* has some copyright protection
automatically - IOW I don't think someone can *legally* use the same
name in the same way . . . for whatever that's worth . . .
Click to expand...
</snip>

It's covered by "Intellectual Property" unless you get it registered or
patented or whatever.

--

Regards

Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group
www.it-mate.co.uk

Keeping it FREE!

Disclaimer:
I know I'm probably wrong, I just like taking part ;o)
 
It's covered by "Intellectual Property" unless you get it registered or
patented or whatever.
Click to expand...

Thanks.
I suspect that if we ever try to let some authors use the recognition, then the
cover/protection for the proper use of "pricelessware" will come under intense
pressure from some of the losing authors who are denied this usage.

DAN
 
DAN said:
Thanks.
I suspect that if we ever try to let some authors use the recognition, then the
cover/protection for the proper use of "pricelessware" will come under intense
pressure from some of the losing authors who are denied this usage.
Click to expand...

Hi DAN,

I rather doubt that - IMO most freeware author's are pretty classy people.

FYI - some winning author's already note the selection of their program
as Pricelessware - and I believe have done so for some time.

Susan
--
Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org
PL2003: http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/about2003PL.htm
PL2004 Review: http://www.pricelessware.org/2004/2004nominationsPL.php
alt.comp.freeware FAQ (short) - maintained by John F.
http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/faq.html
 
Hi DAN,

I rather doubt that - IMO most freeware author's are pretty classy people.

FYI - some winning author's already note the selection of their program
as Pricelessware - and I believe have done so for some time.
Click to expand...
</snip>

Susan,
The only problem I would have with listing any of my programs as
"pricelessware" is basically...... I don't see it as priceless, lol (I just
build it...... if people like it/find it useful,. then even better).

--

Regards

Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group
www.it-mate.co.uk

Keeping it FREE!

Disclaimer:
I know I'm probably wrong, I just like taking part ;o)
 
services@it- said:
Susan,
The only problem I would have with listing any of my programs as
"pricelessware" is basically...... I don't see it as priceless, lol (I just
build it...... if people like it/find it useful,. then even better).
Click to expand...
Steven - lemme put it this way: You and your programs are most welcome
in my home anytime.
POKO
 
Steven - lemme put it this way: You and your programs are most welcome
in my home anytime.
POKO
Click to expand...

hehe POKO, thankyou :o)

Speaking of my programs, I'm actually working on modifying my Cookie Info
utility to allow the deletion of the cookies via command line (aswell as a
brand new deletion routine using FSO (FileSystemObject) and a few bug
fixes/modifications).

--

Regards

Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group
www.it-mate.co.uk

Keeping it FREE!

Disclaimer:
I know I'm probably wrong, I just like taking part ;o)
 
I rather doubt that - IMO most freeware author's are pretty classy people.
Click to expand...

Indeed, good point. You are right.
May it stay this way.
FYI - some winning author's already note the selection of their program
as Pricelessware - and I believe have done so for some time.
Click to expand...

Indeed, and now that you mention it I have seen it on some sites.

DAN
 
Back
Top