D3 Timedemo on 9800Pro

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shawk
  • Start date Start date
S

Shawk

Havent seen any for the 9800Pro's. Wondered how this compares?

800x600 High Quality - 43.5fps (2nd run)
1024x768 High Quality - 40.1fps (2nd run)

Everything on balanced in display properties. No O/C.

AMD Barton XP2800+
ABIT NF7-S(2)
1GB 3200 Twinmos DDR (2x512 sticks)
Sapphire 9800Pro (Omegas 4.7)
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DX 9.0c
TruePower 430W PSU
 
Shawk said:
Havent seen any for the 9800Pro's. Wondered how this compares?

800x600 High Quality - 43.5fps (2nd run)
1024x768 High Quality - 40.1fps (2nd run)

Everything on balanced in display properties. No O/C.

AMD Barton XP2800+
ABIT NF7-S(2)
1GB 3200 Twinmos DDR (2x512 sticks)
Sapphire 9800Pro (Omegas 4.7)
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DX 9.0c
TruePower 430W PSU
Click to expand...

Compared to an FX5900 non ultra @ 475/900 only slightly better;

1024 * 768 High Quality - 38.6fps (2nd run)

AMD Athlon XP 2400
ABIT AT7 MAX
512MB 2700 Twinmos DDR
Aopen FX5900 Non Ultra 400/850 default @ 475/900
Creative Live 5.1
Windows XP Pro
DX 9.0c
Q-TEC 400W
 
Nick Le Lievre said:
Compared to an FX5900 non ultra @ 475/900 only slightly better;

1024 * 768 High Quality - 38.6fps (2nd run)

AMD Athlon XP 2400
ABIT AT7 MAX
512MB 2700 Twinmos DDR
Aopen FX5900 Non Ultra 400/850 default @ 475/900
Creative Live 5.1
Windows XP Pro
DX 9.0c
Q-TEC 400W
Click to expand...

Thanks Nick. Have you tweaked anything within the game yet?
 
Havent seen any for the 9800Pro's. Wondered how this compares?

800x600 High Quality - 43.5fps (2nd run)
1024x768 High Quality - 40.1fps (2nd run)

Everything on balanced in display properties. No O/C.

AMD Barton XP2800+
ABIT NF7-S(2)
1GB 3200 Twinmos DDR (2x512 sticks)
Sapphire 9800Pro (Omegas 4.7)
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DX 9.0c
TruePower 430W PSU
Click to expand...
Your system is really damn close to mine.

AMD Barton 2500+ @ 2.22 GHz
MSI K7N2-L
1 Gb PC2700 Corsair XMS ((2x256)+512 Dual Channel)
ATI 9800 Pro (4.9 Beta) @ 391/357
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DirectX 9.0c
True Power 430W

1024x768 High Quality - 43.6 fps average of 5 runs without first run.
Haven't bothered with 800x600

And that's with VSync enabled and triple buffering turned on in the
control panel.
 
Inglo said:
Havent seen any for the 9800Pro's. Wondered how this compares?

800x600 High Quality - 43.5fps (2nd run)
1024x768 High Quality - 40.1fps (2nd run)

Everything on balanced in display properties. No O/C.

AMD Barton XP2800+
ABIT NF7-S(2)
1GB 3200 Twinmos DDR (2x512 sticks)
Sapphire 9800Pro (Omegas 4.7)
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DX 9.0c
TruePower 430W PSU
Click to expand...
Your system is really damn close to mine.

AMD Barton 2500+ @ 2.22 GHz
MSI K7N2-L
1 Gb PC2700 Corsair XMS ((2x256)+512 Dual Channel)
ATI 9800 Pro (4.9 Beta) @ 391/357
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DirectX 9.0c
True Power 430W

1024x768 High Quality - 43.6 fps average of 5 runs without first run.
Haven't bothered with 800x600

And that's with VSync enabled and triple buffering turned on in the
control panel.


--
The Brain From Planet Arous (1958):
"Bad alien Gor takes over scientist Steve's brain; good alien Vol takes over Steve's dog's brain."

Steve [Inglo]
Click to expand...

Yup but my 9800Pro's running at stock 378/337.5. Havent tried O/C this card
(its pretty new). Are you using additional cooling etc? VSYNC enabled here
as well, dont know about triple buffering. Using 2xAA for in game -
acceptably smooth gameplay and nicer graphics (IMO). Shaun
 
Yup but my 9800Pro's running at stock 378/337.5. Havent tried O/C this card
(its pretty new). Are you using additional cooling etc? VSYNC enabled here
as well, dont know about triple buffering. Using 2xAA for in game -
acceptably smooth gameplay and nicer graphics (IMO). Shaun
Click to expand...
I've got an arctic cooler on mine, I usually overclock it to 405/371 but
I read so many sparklie stories with the 9800 pro that I lowered it a bit.
Some people have had to *underclock* their cards to avoid getting the
little white spots.
Triple Buffering can be found in the OpenGL element of the 3D settings
tab, hit the compatibility button.
 
Shawk said:
Havent seen any for the 9800Pro's. Wondered how this compares?

800x600 High Quality - 43.5fps (2nd run)
1024x768 High Quality - 40.1fps (2nd run)

Everything on balanced in display properties. No O/C.

AMD Barton XP2800+
ABIT NF7-S(2)
1GB 3200 Twinmos DDR (2x512 sticks)
Sapphire 9800Pro (Omegas 4.7)
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DX 9.0c
TruePower 430W PSU
Click to expand...

Theese are my results on medium quality, I'll try later at high quality.

AMD64 3000
512 ddr pc3200 ram
ATI 9800 pro stock speeds

Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Rob.
 
I've got an arctic cooler on mine, I usually overclock it to 405/371
but I read so many sparklie stories with the 9800 pro that I lowered
it a bit.
Some people have had to *underclock* their cards to avoid getting the
little white spots.
Triple Buffering can be found in the OpenGL element of the 3D settings
tab, hit the compatibility button.
Click to expand...
Oh and the above is artifact issue is in reference to the 9800s problems
in Doom3 only.
 
Inglo said:
Yup but my 9800Pro's running at stock 378/337.5. Havent tried O/C this card
(its pretty new). Are you using additional cooling etc? VSYNC enabled here
as well, dont know about triple buffering. Using 2xAA for in game -
acceptably smooth gameplay and nicer graphics (IMO). Shaun
Click to expand...
I've got an arctic cooler on mine, I usually overclock it to 405/371 but
I read so many sparklie stories with the 9800 pro that I lowered it a bit.
Some people have had to *underclock* their cards to avoid getting the
little white spots.
Triple Buffering can be found in the OpenGL element of the 3D settings
tab, hit the compatibility button.

--
The Brain From Planet Arous (1958):
"Bad alien Gor takes over scientist Steve's brain; good alien Vol takes over Steve's dog's brain."

Steve [Inglo]
Click to expand...

Inglo, how difficult is it to fit an arctic cooler? Thanks, Shaun
 
Inglo, how difficult is it to fit an arctic cooler? Thanks, Shaun
Click to expand...
Takes 10 minutes (well, putting on the thermal compound carefully might
add a little), I got mine for $15.
 
Ive got an almost identical system. Only difference is that I am using an MSI NForce mobo (MSI K7N2
ILSR) , PC2700 mem and mobo 5.1 sound (but that shouldnt matter because the demo is silent)

I see 37fps for 1024x768, but you seem to be getting higher than me even though I am OCing
(430/370). Dont see any sparkles because I have an arctic fitted, but then again, I dont seem to
see a performance increase in this game either :(

Are you OCing? Otherwise it may be that the XP2800 is the limiting factor for both of us.

Oh, btw, I get about 6200-6300 in 3Dmark2003

S


 
Shawk said:
Havent seen any for the 9800Pro's. Wondered how this compares?

800x600 High Quality - 43.5fps (2nd run)
1024x768 High Quality - 40.1fps (2nd run)

Everything on balanced in display properties. No O/C.

AMD Barton XP2800+
ABIT NF7-S(2)
1GB 3200 Twinmos DDR (2x512 sticks)
Sapphire 9800Pro (Omegas 4.7)
Audigy
Win XP Pro
DX 9.0c
TruePower 430W PSU
Click to expand...

800x600 High Quality - 53fps (2nd run)
1024x768 High Quality - 41.5fps (2nd run)

Everything on balanced

AMD Mobile Barton XP2500+ @ 2090Mhz (due to ram)
Asus A7N8X E Deluxe
512 (2x256) Crappy 400 Ram (running at 333 due to its crapness)
Sapphire 9800Pro @ stock speeds (Cats 4.7)
Win XP Pro
DX9.0b
400 Watt psu
NF2 onboard sound
 
Sham B said:
Ive got an almost identical system. Only difference is that I am using an MSI NForce mobo (MSI K7N2
ILSR) , PC2700 mem and mobo 5.1 sound (but that shouldnt matter because the demo is silent)

I see 37fps for 1024x768, but you seem to be getting higher than me even though I am OCing
(430/370). Dont see any sparkles because I have an arctic fitted, but then again, I dont seem to
see a performance increase in this game either :(

Are you OCing? Otherwise it may be that the XP2800 is the limiting factor for both of us.

Oh, btw, I get about 6200-6300 in 3Dmark2003

S
Click to expand...

No overclocking on this PC at all but have started to 'tune' the game to my
system. Only thing tried so far is a change in the doomconfig.cfg file.
Scrolled down to the anisotropy setting (seta image_anisotropy) and changed
it from "8" to "2". This seems to be the biggest framerate killer in high
quality for me and its allowed me to play smoothly at high quality with
2xAA. Shaun
 
Ive got an almost identical system. Only difference is that I am using an MSI NForce mobo (MSI K7N2
ILSR) , PC2700 mem and mobo 5.1 sound (but that shouldnt matter because the demo is silent)

I see 37fps for 1024x768, but you seem to be getting higher than me even though I am OCing
(430/370). Dont see any sparkles because I have an arctic fitted, but then again, I dont seem to
see a performance increase in this game either :(

Are you OCing? Otherwise it may be that the XP2800 is the limiting factor for both of us.

Oh, btw, I get about 6200-6300 in 3Dmark2003

S
Click to expand...
Are those test 1 or test 2 results? Your system is even more identical
to mine; K7N2-L, PC2700, Arctic Cooler .
The first run I average 37-38 second run 43-44 fps. In case you missed
it, almost everyone is using a second run through when reporting
benchmark results.
Run with vsync enabled in game and triple buffering enabled in OpenGL
control panel.
I don't have quite the overclock on my card and I get a little less than
6100 in 3DMark03.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2859488
You didn't say which drivers you're using.
 
Inglo said:
Ive got an almost identical system. Only difference is that I am using an MSI NForce mobo (MSI K7N2
ILSR) , PC2700 mem and mobo 5.1 sound (but that shouldnt matter because the demo is silent)

I see 37fps for 1024x768, but you seem to be getting higher than me even though I am OCing
(430/370). Dont see any sparkles because I have an arctic fitted, but then again, I dont seem to
see a performance increase in this game either :(

Are you OCing? Otherwise it may be that the XP2800 is the limiting factor for both of us.

Oh, btw, I get about 6200-6300 in 3Dmark2003

S
Click to expand...
Are those test 1 or test 2 results? Your system is even more identical
to mine; K7N2-L, PC2700, Arctic Cooler .
The first run I average 37-38 second run 43-44 fps. In case you missed
it, almost everyone is using a second run through when reporting
benchmark results.
Run with vsync enabled in game and triple buffering enabled in OpenGL
control panel.
I don't have quite the overclock on my card and I get a little less than
6100 in 3DMark03.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2859488
You didn't say which drivers you're using.

--
The Brain From Planet Arous (1958):
"Bad alien Gor takes over scientist Steve's brain; good alien Vol takes over Steve's dog's brain."

Steve [Inglo]
Click to expand...

Getting 5700 in 3DMark here but no o/c and Omega drivers (not the best for
benching). Might have to look at a new cooler and o/cing the card. Shaun
 
--System specs below--

[CAT 4.5]

"timedemo demo1"
1024x768 (D3-High Quality) 4x-AA 16x-AF = 24.2fps
1024x768 (D3-High Quality) NO-AA 8x-AF = 46.5fps

[CAT 4.9 beta]

"timedemo demo1"
1024x768 (D3-High Quality) 4x-AA 16x-AF = 22.3fps
1024x768 (D3-High Quality) NO-AA 8x-AF = 46.5fps

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Windows XP (2600-Professional) w/ SP1
AMD Socket 939 Athlon 64 FX-53, 1MB L2 Cache
ASUS "A8V Deluxe Wi-Fi" K8T800 Pro
VIA Hyperion 4in1 451v
1024mb (2 x (512mb OCZ Platinum EL (2-3-2-5) DDR400/PC3200) Dual Channel)
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro (Catalyst 4.5) (C-378mhz / M-337.5mhz) OC to
(C-411.75mhz / M-360.00mhz)
SbAudigy 5.1 (PCI-Slot 3)

120gb Western Digital WD1200JB primary/master
60gb IBM 60gxp primary/slave
16x HI-VAL DVDrom (BDV316C) secondary/master
48x/24x/48x plextor (PX-W4824A) secondary/slave

LianLi PC-6070 *Silent* Aluminum Mid-Tower Case | 2x80mm intake fans, 1x80mm
exhaust fan
PowerMax 470watt Aluminum PSU | +3.3V@26A +5V@47A +12V@28A
 
Back
Top