personally I don't have a problem with MY gov't taking a random cross
section of what the general public is searching for. I'd like to know to
if it helps homeland security - YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT?
pfft! whats the big deal
or...maybe we should set up our own search engines and compete with
google...
and then we will have more than a cross section, we will have all sorts
of user data.
If I was google, I would just say...DAMN RIGHT! if I can be helpful,
here you go.
They are not asking for personal info etc...
That's my thoughts.
I don't believe that was my comment. However, for me there are three
issues. One I don't want the gov't or anyone secretly collecting data
without court approved probable cause warrant, i.e., 4th Amendment. Second
there is little proof that data mining will prevent terrorist acts. Third
the government is asking Google for a cross section of searches and
websites related to pornography not terrorism.
The businesses already track your credit ratings so if one is late on
almost any payment your credit risk increases. The Federal and a few
state governments already tried to subpoena abortion medical records to
try and identify women who may have had abortions. Lastly, how would you
feel if you were fired or turned down for a job because of your
undisclosed family medical history?
FYI, particular attention to the end of statement.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported
by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.