Salut/Hi R. C. White,
le/on Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:08:30 -0600, tu disais/you said:-
Good point. I'd sort of not noticed your "PC" restriction. So strike the
Sinclairs which were never called PCs. The Amstrads were on the other
hand,
The CPC 464 was the "Colour Personal Computer" model 4 with 64k of RAM.
My
6128 did have a single 3" floppy drive and 128k of RAM.
I wouldn't want to go to the wall over this, but in those days quite a
lot
of data was stored on little tape cassettes, and paper tape drives were
used
too. I THINK the earliest IBM PCs had 5.25" floppy drives (truly floppy
by
the way). At the time, the debate was over whether CPM or MSDOS would
prevail. MSDOS stood for Microsoft Disc Operating System, so it's logical
that even from its earliest day the IMB PC was conceived of as using
floppies.
I've seen some discussions of the possibility and I can well imagine
quite a
number of possible other circumstances when the ability to boot from a
removable drive might be useful. For example, one could imagine having a
second operating system on a plug in drive and that could be kept
entirely
separate. One could even conceive of someone who kept XP on one USB drive
and Linux or Unix on another, keeping nothing but encrypted data on the
main
computer hard drive. That would be extraordinarily secure, if you think
about it, as without having access to the appropriate OS, you couldn't
even
_begin_ to know how to approach data decryption. For example, a Truecrypt
encrypted drive looks and feels like an unformatted drive. It can only be
unlocked with a running version of the software and the right password.
Of
course, it goes without saying that such a thing would be very unpopular
with Law enforcement agencies, as it would be impossible to prove that
the
hard drive WAS an encrypted drive.
--
All the Best
Ian Hoare
http://www.souvigne.com
mailbox full to avoid spam. try me at website