Debbie said:Someone on here did tell me what I had to set in my bios of the
Asus P5K-V to keep the multipler set to 9.5 but I didn't write the
info down. Could anyone help me?
Shenan Stanley said:Google.
Only other post from you...
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/browse_frm/thread/349a8385b2ab3fe9
Debbie said:Someone on here did tell me what I had to set in my bios of the
Asus P5K-V to keep the multipler set to 9.5 but I didn't write the
info down. Could anyone help me?
Shenan said:Google.
Only other post from you...
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/browse_frm/thread/349a8385b2ab3fe9
Otherwise, manufacturer FAQ, etc
Bennett said:
Debbie said:Someone on here did tell me what I had to set in my bios of the
Asus P5K-V to keep the multipler set to 9.5 but I didn't write the
info down. Could anyone help me?
Shenan said:Google.
Only other post from you...
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/browse_frm/thread/349a8385b2ab3fe9
Otherwise, manufacturer FAQ, etc
Bennett said:
Shenan said:You are correct; although I would have shortened your google result
hyperlink even without the use of tinyurl.com to:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?&as_uauthors=debbie+graham
I misspoke. I meant it was the only posting from Debbie with a few
keywords in it - like 9.5 and multiplier and Asus P5K-V and
Debbie... One would assume that if Debbie says she was told about
that here - those words would be a part of it.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?&q=Asus+P5K-V+9.5+multiplier+debbie
Thanks!
Debbie said:Well I don't remember the correct subject, I believe it started out
talking about overclocking. But I did manage to find out what I
needed to do in the BIOS. I did a search and tried something that
someone else had a similar problem with and it worked
Debbie Graham said:Well I don't remember the correct subject, I believe it started out
talking about overclocking. But I did manage to find out what I needed to
do in the BIOS. I did a search and tried something that someone else had
a similar problem with and it worked
Debbie
I disabled the Cie support and the intel speedstep. Not sure the speedstep
has to be disabled for sure
Debbie
Would you mind posting what you did here? Both for yourself and anyone
else who might search on such a subject in the future?
It sounds like things were working as designed.
It sounds like you have successfully disabled the C1E and SpeedStep
options, which could be just fine, but they have a purpose.
Was the disabling an attempt to resolve a particular problem or did
you just notice the multiplier changing and didn't like it changing?
Debbie Graham said:I disabled the Cie support and the intel speedstep. Not sure the speedstep
has to be disabled for sure
Debbie
I disabled the Cie support and the intel speedstep. Not sure the speedstep
has to be disabled for sure
Debbie
Would you mind posting what you did here? Both for yourself and anyone
else who might search on such a subject in the future?
It sounds like things were working as designed.
It sounds like you have successfully disabled the C1E and SpeedStep
options, which could be just fine, but they have a purpose.
Was the disabling an attempt to resolve a particular problem or did
you just notice the multiplier changing and didn't like it changing?
JS said:Speed Step dynamically adjusts the multiplier
depending on the CPU load.
If you want to watch Speed Step do its thing then download CPUZ
http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
--
JS
http://www.pagestart.com
Debbie Graham said:I disabled the Cie support and the intel speedstep. Not sure the
speedstep has to be disabled for sure
Debbie
I do use CPUZ that's how I noticed the 9.5 was changed to 6.0
Debbie
JS said:Speed Step dynamically adjusts the multiplier
depending on the CPU load.If you want to watch Speed Step do its thing then download CPUZ
http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
I was just curious those features involve some power saving stuff.