Most likely it is trying for compatibility with some long forgotten
competitor.
Got any specifics to go with that thoroughly ignorant shot-in-the-dark?
From 123's online help:
"@COV
@COV(range1;range2;[type]) calculates either the population or sample covariance
of the values in range1 and
range2.
Arguments
range1 and range2 are the names or addresses of ranges. range1 and range2 must
be the same size. If range1 or
range 2 are not the same size, @COV returns ERR.
1-2-3 pairs cells in the two ranges by their same order in the range. Ranges are
ordered from top to bottom, left to
right, first sheet through last.
type is an optional argument that specifies whether to calculate the population
or sample covariance.
type 1-2-3 calculates
0 Population covariance; default if you omit the argument
1 Sample covariance"
Perhaps you're referring to some shareware spreadsheet you heard someone telling
someone else had a covariance function that worked like Excels.
To address your evident ignorance, Excel had its COVAR function before 123 had
its @COV function, so Microsoft screwed this up all on their own.