D
Davy
Wat corporative antivirus should i use MaCafee, Kaspersky,
Trend,Sophos,Avast....
Trend,Sophos,Avast....
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
D
David H. Lipman
From: "Davy" <[email protected]>
| Wat corporative antivirus should i use MaCafee, Kaspersky,
| Trend,Sophos,Avast....
|
I always suggest McAfee Enterprise anti virus.
| Wat corporative antivirus should i use MaCafee, Kaspersky,
| Trend,Sophos,Avast....
|
I always suggest McAfee Enterprise anti virus.
D
Dustbin
David said:I always suggest McAfee Enterprise anti virus.
Why? Are you really that bitter at the world?
G
Gabriela Salvisberg
Am Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:32:19 +0000 schrieb David H. Lipman:
If I had to evaluate a corporate AV product, I'd certainly use two
products from different manufacturers that are using different scan
engines. One on the mail server and the other one on the desktops.
If one fails to detect a malware, there's a chance that the second one
detects it.
Gabriela
From: "Davy" <[email protected]>
| Wat corporative antivirus should i use MaCafee, Kaspersky,
| Trend,Sophos,Avast....
|
I always suggest McAfee Enterprise anti virus.
If I had to evaluate a corporate AV product, I'd certainly use two
products from different manufacturers that are using different scan
engines. One on the mail server and the other one on the desktops.
If one fails to detect a malware, there's a chance that the second one
detects it.
Gabriela
D
David H. Lipman
From: "Gabriela Salvisberg" <[email protected]>
|
| If I had to evaluate a corporate AV product, I'd certainly use two
| products from different manufacturers that are using different scan
| engines. One on the mail server and the other one on the desktops.
|
| If one fails to detect a malware, there's a chance that the second one
| detects it.
|
| Gabriela
That's a very good point and thanx Gabriela for bringing it up.
In a corporate environment a heterogeneous anti virus solution is much better than a
homogeneous solution.
|
| If I had to evaluate a corporate AV product, I'd certainly use two
| products from different manufacturers that are using different scan
| engines. One on the mail server and the other one on the desktops.
|
| If one fails to detect a malware, there's a chance that the second one
| detects it.
|
| Gabriela
That's a very good point and thanx Gabriela for bringing it up.
In a corporate environment a heterogeneous anti virus solution is much better than a
homogeneous solution.
A
Ayatollah Yootwiessalreddi
The corporate version of McAfee is lightyears better than theWhy? Are you really that bitter at the world?
consumer edition.
We use McAfee and Sophos here.
In recent evals, F-Secure looked quite handy (rebadged
Kaspersky, iirc, and a nice central management console).
D
Dustbin
Ayatollah said:The corporate version of McAfee is lightyears better than the
consumer edition.
At work, everyone disables it because it hogs your system too much when it
runs. What good is an AV that everyone disables?
A
Ayatollah Yootwiessalreddi
(a) We don't find it to be too much of a system hog here (~At work, everyone disables it because it hogs your system too much when it
runs. What good is an AV that everyone disables?
20,000 installations). But we don't include the daily scan in
the default install - that one is a bit processor-intensive.
(b) Why do your end users have the capability to disable it?
D
Dustbin
Ayatollah said:(b) Why do your end users have the capability to disable it?
They design either computer hardware or software for a living. If the're
determined, they can do anything; you won't be able to stop them.