From: "pete0085" <
[email protected]>
| Symantec does a good job but it seems so resource intensive. Too often we
| find it's taking too much of the free memory and cpu.
| We are due for an upgrade as our license will expire and looking for other
| possible alernatives.
| Something that we can easily manage from one central location and does a
| good job finding, detecing and removing malware, spyware, etc.
| We use the same anti-virus software for all the servers - symantec corporate
| edition 10.x
| Sorry for not clarifying this further with you.
I use Symantec Corp. Ed. 10x and I don't find it to be neraly the resource hog of its
sibling, Norton AV.
Comparatively, I use McAfee Enterprise v8.50i. Its intrusion detection system, buffer
overflow detection/protection and system policies are excellent and not a burdon on
resources.
If you use Symantec on Exchange Servers, McAfee Enterprise v8.50i on workstations and
another solution of Proxy Servers and Border Gateways you will improve your defenses
greatly. And of course, McAfee has excellent centralized AV management through ePolicy
Orchestrator.
I do NOT suggest using the same AV product on servers, workstations, proxies and Border
Gateways.